I'm more of a democrat as most of you know...more left leaning centrist and I notice a lot of today's kids... 25 and under...just a self-concept because of how the current generation kind of "presents itself" with its more than ever radical standing...on both the left and right side.
I know all 3 make money at a good level...but Does race-baiting count as fear-based articles? content (theme) wise...because you can mix the race-bait with fear and it brings in more views and money...I notice federal/local media using the word...white...meanwhile not using the victim's color...so they get a click, victim could be black or white.... meanwhile we naturally go into it thinking it's black or a minority... I mean...what does that say about us as American people... what the media/Twitter and social media has did to us over a short time of 2 years.
When I go and I see color in an article... I think immediately... "It's white on black" due to all of the hysteria following that "ideal", I've never thought...oh hey it's going to be white on Mexican or ....black on Mexican..even during the George floyd thing...they said white...when there was White...Asian...and I believe Mexican officers on the scene.
As a more..."real democrat/centrist" I find this sick and not progressive...it's attempting to use the problems of a few years ago as a... topic to keep us from bettering America in general...with how long the argument of white on black violence has been going on...we could have reformed education.... we could have lowered car deaths or even lowered the amount of "hate in America"... when you keep pushing for something that isn't there as bad as you claim...it hurts the people pushing for its the view and it hurts the avg American because they will face this in the day to day from a radical... "You did that because I'm black"... or "You won't sell me this because your a democrat and I'm a republican"...It creates more separation at the cost of money...but like...Why are today's radical... progressives not as good as the prior years...or the golden days of American radicalism...is it because children are the majority in it...and the news appeasers to them compared to the older/grown American...is it because we as a culture are getting dumber and unable to think of new movements that help everyone at the cost of a smaller group... such as the removal of slaves... females voting, the right of 18-year-olds to vote...the idea of 2 senators a state...to give a chance for mutual lateral voting intrastate...via democrat/Repub senator....
What has America went to...both sides want to progress America and the only way to do this is what it always has been.... protest **radicals will do damage and such...but this even happened in the days of MLK...even during the Vietnam days... radicals hurt and damage** meanwhile the normal leaning party member won't. then it's covered in the media...claiming that the other side is bad or radical so they can continue to fish money out of the American's eyes/viewership...so they stay... because they feel "Fully informed by the injection theory"
I'm sure we both democrat/republican on the forum can agree...this young generation of "radical/party member" isn't good they are becoming more radical and more...destructive without a heavy basis...be them democrat or republican and they make our parties look bad and divide us more...it's not the adults...it's the kids and I'm 22 and I'm saying this...it's bad..it's so bad that I want the right to vote revoked till the age of 40 or 35 so we can develop more and understand what "a voice/voting" is... because my age clearly don't.... I don't know if this is due to what I see in the media...or if it's what is in my Facebook feed from fellow young genners...twitter...parlor or any of it..the young generation seems radical on all ends...left or right...but an outlier is always present and some aren't...
I'm sure we can both unilaterally agree...the other side isn't bad...it's our prenotion that we are being attacked...via media...via "The representatives of the party".... but... pelosi...isnt' a real democrat... trump wasn't a real Republican and aoc isnt' a real democrat...they are a radical leaning in the party...and CNN trys to tell you they are...fox trys to tell you they are...same for republican leaners like mitch...or gouty...they weren't real republicans/democrats...because they attack the other side so hard...and refuse to hold any kind of dialog to change opinion...
pt 1 p2 in comments.
I know all 3 make money at a good level...but Does race-baiting count as fear-based articles? content (theme) wise...because you can mix the race-bait with fear and it brings in more views and money...I notice federal/local media using the word...white...meanwhile not using the victim's color...so they get a click, victim could be black or white.... meanwhile we naturally go into it thinking it's black or a minority... I mean...what does that say about us as American people... what the media/Twitter and social media has did to us over a short time of 2 years.
When I go and I see color in an article... I think immediately... "It's white on black" due to all of the hysteria following that "ideal", I've never thought...oh hey it's going to be white on Mexican or ....black on Mexican..even during the George floyd thing...they said white...when there was White...Asian...and I believe Mexican officers on the scene.
As a more..."real democrat/centrist" I find this sick and not progressive...it's attempting to use the problems of a few years ago as a... topic to keep us from bettering America in general...with how long the argument of white on black violence has been going on...we could have reformed education.... we could have lowered car deaths or even lowered the amount of "hate in America"... when you keep pushing for something that isn't there as bad as you claim...it hurts the people pushing for its the view and it hurts the avg American because they will face this in the day to day from a radical... "You did that because I'm black"... or "You won't sell me this because your a democrat and I'm a republican"...It creates more separation at the cost of money...but like...Why are today's radical... progressives not as good as the prior years...or the golden days of American radicalism...is it because children are the majority in it...and the news appeasers to them compared to the older/grown American...is it because we as a culture are getting dumber and unable to think of new movements that help everyone at the cost of a smaller group... such as the removal of slaves... females voting, the right of 18-year-olds to vote...the idea of 2 senators a state...to give a chance for mutual lateral voting intrastate...via democrat/Repub senator....
What has America went to...both sides want to progress America and the only way to do this is what it always has been.... protest **radicals will do damage and such...but this even happened in the days of MLK...even during the Vietnam days... radicals hurt and damage** meanwhile the normal leaning party member won't. then it's covered in the media...claiming that the other side is bad or radical so they can continue to fish money out of the American's eyes/viewership...so they stay... because they feel "Fully informed by the injection theory"
I'm sure we both democrat/republican on the forum can agree...this young generation of "radical/party member" isn't good they are becoming more radical and more...destructive without a heavy basis...be them democrat or republican and they make our parties look bad and divide us more...it's not the adults...it's the kids and I'm 22 and I'm saying this...it's bad..it's so bad that I want the right to vote revoked till the age of 40 or 35 so we can develop more and understand what "a voice/voting" is... because my age clearly don't.... I don't know if this is due to what I see in the media...or if it's what is in my Facebook feed from fellow young genners...twitter...parlor or any of it..the young generation seems radical on all ends...left or right...but an outlier is always present and some aren't...
I'm sure we can both unilaterally agree...the other side isn't bad...it's our prenotion that we are being attacked...via media...via "The representatives of the party".... but... pelosi...isnt' a real democrat... trump wasn't a real Republican and aoc isnt' a real democrat...they are a radical leaning in the party...and CNN trys to tell you they are...fox trys to tell you they are...same for republican leaners like mitch...or gouty...they weren't real republicans/democrats...because they attack the other side so hard...and refuse to hold any kind of dialog to change opinion...
pt 1 p2 in comments.