-
Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2017
- Location
- Perth Western Australia
First video excellent 2nd video unfortunately simply to old to be accurately reliable. But has relevance.
DucknCover
Guest
About the super EMP weapon that was talked in the first video.
200.000 volts per meter is so high that it will not only destroy hardenened electronic devices at 50,000 Volts/meter but it will kill people, stop the heart and destroy the brain function and are carcinogenic.
The exposure limit for high frequency radiation is 62 volts/meter (microwaves 1,4 Ghz) and the lower the frequency of the radiation the less harmful it will be but even so
the exposure limit for low frequency radiation of 0.1 to 1 Hz is 5000 volts/meter (fields around high voltage cables)
Source: ICNIRP (International Commission for the Protection against Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection)
The normal level in nature is <0,0001 Volts / meter.
200.000 volts per meter is so high that it will not only destroy hardenened electronic devices at 50,000 Volts/meter but it will kill people, stop the heart and destroy the brain function and are carcinogenic.
The exposure limit for high frequency radiation is 62 volts/meter (microwaves 1,4 Ghz) and the lower the frequency of the radiation the less harmful it will be but even so
the exposure limit for low frequency radiation of 0.1 to 1 Hz is 5000 volts/meter (fields around high voltage cables)
Source: ICNIRP (International Commission for the Protection against Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection)
The normal level in nature is <0,0001 Volts / meter.
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2016
- Location
- Indiana, US
Um, yeah, no... You are so incorrect here that I don't even know where to begin.
First, the human body can withstand a 100,000 V/m EMP spike. Experiments have been conducted with an EMP of 25,000 V/m with no effect on the subjects involved. Several neuroscientists have stated that humans can easily withstand EMP up to 100,000 V/m without detrimental effect.
Second, you're talking about exposure limits for microwaves in the GHz range, and gamma radiation is in the EHz (exahertz) range. In other words, you're comparing apples and dolphins.
I only allowed your post through so I could correct it. You need to stop posting disinformation. Period. I'm not going to warn you again.
DucknCover
Guest
I expected to see some corrections because we are lacking of real information about this topic and I see you have some real information @RiffRaff.
You are correct about alot I guess but 200,000 V/m are above what has been tested and this would be probably not the highest setting for this kind of weapon.
And also I lack the knowledge about the attack capablilites of modern satellites, I'm aware that those EMP spikes will be taken quiet easily but some continues ore pulsed microwave rays could be used.
And I don't know if gamma rays (exahertz) was ever used in an human experiment. I don't want to compare apples and ... just hand me over some of your sources of information.
You are correct about alot I guess but 200,000 V/m are above what has been tested and this would be probably not the highest setting for this kind of weapon.
And also I lack the knowledge about the attack capablilites of modern satellites, I'm aware that those EMP spikes will be taken quiet easily but some continues ore pulsed microwave rays could be used.
And I don't know if gamma rays (exahertz) was ever used in an human experiment. I don't want to compare apples and ... just hand me over some of your sources of information.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2016
Wow not even the same genetic tree Thats harsh RiffRaff
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2016
I’ve seen a human survive a near by lighting strike and a static charge that stood his hair on end like a Tesla coil experiment.I expected to see some corrections because we are lacking of real information about this topic and I see you have some real information @RiffRaff.
You are correct about alot I guess but 200,000 V/m are above what has been tested and this would be probably not the highest setting for this kind of weapon.
And also I lack the knowledge about the attack capablilites of modern satellites, I'm aware that those EMP spikes will be taken quiet easily but some continues ore pulsed microwave rays could be used.
And I don't know if gamma rays (exahertz) was ever used in an human experiment. I don't want to compare apples and ... just hand me over some of your sources of information.
The danger with electricity and voltage is always the amps and if it passes through the human body or sheds along it’s surface.
Now I have also known electricians who’ve been hit with high voltage and couldn’t wear a electric watch for years as well because the batteries always discharged straight away.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2016
- Location
- Indiana, US
just hand me over some of your sources of information.
You bet. Please see attached my study guides on EMP. You might also check out the article I wrote on EMP for DEFCON a few years back.
You bet. Please see attached my study guides on EMP. You might also check out the article I wrote on EMP for DEFCON a few years back.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2017
- Location
- Perth Western Australia
I think sentinel first video was great. As far as American forces global projection capabilities. Nowadays are obsolete. Considering aircraft carrier fleets are in critical danger Nowadays. Why?
1. Speed and distance of hyposonic missiles can break defense capabilities of carrier and fleet.
2. These can be launched from land,sea and air.
3. Stealth of submarines of the enemy is also a major threat to detection capabilities. Aswell as the advanced weapons systems and increased speed of such weapons threat. Making manuvrability harder to avoid strike.
In short aircraft carrier fleets = massive loss of life at sea. Hence why admirals show so much concern Nowadays.
1. Speed and distance of hyposonic missiles can break defense capabilities of carrier and fleet.
2. These can be launched from land,sea and air.
3. Stealth of submarines of the enemy is also a major threat to detection capabilities. Aswell as the advanced weapons systems and increased speed of such weapons threat. Making manuvrability harder to avoid strike.
In short aircraft carrier fleets = massive loss of life at sea. Hence why admirals show so much concern Nowadays.
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2010
- defconwarningsystem
- DEFCONWSALERTS
- YOUTUBE
- DefconWarningSystem
No context. Meaningless.
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2016
What....Jim Cramer......meaningless hyperbole........nah.
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2016
- Location
- Indiana, US
No, I need someone to stop posting crap nonsense to convince us they know what they're talking about. They don't. The only thing I'm projecting is proof of that.
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2017
First, it is Jim Cramer... "Mad Money Jim Cramer."
So.... he has been outrageous every hour of every day for at 15 years that I can remember.
Also apparently there are several conservative media sites that have been talking about nuclear war bunkers also. I found out that Fox News had a video on that yesterday. Jim Cramer apparently was also outspoken on POTUS Biden's remarks over the weekend. I think that is where this is all coming from.
"Crisis in Ukraine Triggers Bunker Sales" - Fox News interviews Rising S Company - Rising S company says instead of 60 calls, he has gotten 3,000 calls.
‘Whole world’ is freaked out during Russia-Ukraine crisis: Bunker company official | Fox News Video
Lawrence Jones tours a fallout bunker amid a boon in sales on ‘Cross Country.’
video.foxnews.com
Business is booming... for doomsday bunkers! Texas-based company claims sales have spiked '1000%' for units ranging from $40,000 to $8.5M after Russia invaded Ukraine
Business is booming...for doomsday bunkers!
Rising S Bunkers sells survival shelters ranging from a $39,500 'mini bunker' to an $8.35million 'aristocrat' bunker that fit up to 44 people.
Business Insider: Manufacturers report a spike in demand for underground shelters since Russia invaded Ukraine, but an anthropologist who studies preppers says the real pros don't do bunkers
Manufacturers report a spike in demand for underground shelters since Russia invaded Ukraine, but an anthropologist who studies preppers says the real pros don't do bunkers
"There's always a panic buy when things like this happen," Atlas Survival Shelters CEO Ron Hubbard told Insider
www.businessinsider.com
DucknCover
Guest
However, as long as insanity isn't taking over, a nuclear war isn't going to happen.
The conventional war is bad enough and NATO needs to stop Russia just like this - conventionally.
It would be another great mistake in the history of the West to continue to watch the genocide in Ukraine.
Russia isn't going to stop there and we will see it, but then it's a little late.
The conventional war is bad enough and NATO needs to stop Russia just like this - conventionally.
It would be another great mistake in the history of the West to continue to watch the genocide in Ukraine.
Russia isn't going to stop there and we will see it, but then it's a little late.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2022
- Location
- England
I would take Mr. Cramer's statements with a pinch of salt.
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2022
- LOCATION
- Fly over country
I agree it is an oxymoron to postulate the future of war.
But when in human history has this proclivity been successful turned off.
More talks more trade more exchange. Yes in time hostilities between particular nations have been put to rest.
But just as often they have reignited.
It’s part of our evolutionary development. Even in non-human primates mammals anthropoids we see the constant posturing and fight over resources and mating opportunities.
Don’t get me wrong we should always work towards peaceful relations and avoid conflict. But there is nothing to be surprised with when conflict breaks out. Nor should we expect it to go away anytime soon.
You can’t apply wishful thinking to cultural anthropology.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2017
- Location
- Perth Western Australia
Unfortunately it will always exist
Question is how long until it returns to sticks and stones?
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2022
- LOCATION
- Fly over country
I would believe that in a major war even with nukes coming into play that it would not be a total civilization destroyer.
One or more nations might be beat down badly and basically collapse and fall apart. But one thing that is different today. The higher level dissemination of technology construction and use is spread across the globe. Things would be different and tough but civilization would continue on.
It wouldn’t be sticks and stones everywhere.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
You get it, mate: Our very existence hangs on a precipice.