- Joined
- Mar 3, 2021
Article By Major Sammer Toorr (Infantry Combat Veteran)(Urban Warfare Specialist)
I concur
Article By Major Sammer Toorr (Infantry Combat Veteran)(Urban Warfare Specialist)
I concur
How did we do this? How does the author know this to be true?Russian S-300 and Chinese HQ-9 air defense systems are now exposed not destroyed but decoded.
He doesn't. It's a load of masturbatory BS from a nobody with no credentials.The article provides the following statement but does not justify this position, prove its truth, offer supporting evidence for this conclusion.
How does the author know this to be true?
What the hell is a "Russian Smersh AA"?I’m curious if the blackhawks had to defeat Russian Smersh AA.
China “anti-stealth” radar fails Venezuela, Taiwan media report. The Chinese-made systems had been billed as the strongest air defense system in South America. But in light of the failure, some have called the radar systems “expensive ornaments.”
US forces not only proved Russian air defense useless but also proved Chinese technology useless.
The United States likely knew Venezuelan radar network better than the Venezuelans themselves did. With their knowledge of the radar system, the US probably could have flown the Goodyear blimp into Caracas if the fancy struck.![]()
Well, he was a major, and claims to be a Green Beret veteran. https://www.instagram.com/samartoorr/He doesn't. It's a load of masturbatory BS from a nobody with no credentials.
Being an "Infantry combat veteran" (which presumably means the guy was a grunt in the Army at some point) does not make you an AA/AD expert.
I'd still would have liked to have seen some discussion or evidence to support the quote he made in the article, reposted below. From what I see, the conclusions he draws in the article rest on this quote. It's an interesting article but I think it carries little weight without additional support.Well, he was a major, and claims to be a Green Beret veteran. https://www.instagram.com/samartoorr/
Russian S-300 and Chinese HQ-9 air defense systems are now exposed not destroyed but decoded.
I agree.I'd still would have liked to have seen some discussion or evidence to support the quote he made in the article, reposted below. From what I see, the conclusions he draws in the article rest on this quote. It's an interesting article but I think it carries little weight without additional support.
I think how they did it is a state secret, and I wouldn't post it if I knew. As to how the author knows it to be true, I would refer to the facts that no aircraft has been shoot down in the recent airstrikes. US and Israeli. I don't think it was just luck.The article provides the following statement but does not justify this position, prove its truth, offer supporting evidence for this conclusion.
How did we do this? How does the author know this to be true?
I accept his opinion as a qualified expert opinion. There are many officers in many militaries that have multiple degrees and in western services, a PHD before 0-7Well, he was a major, and claims to be a Green Beret veteran. https://www.instagram.com/samartoorr/

Yeah. In the Indian army.Well, he was a major, and claims to be a Green Beret veteran. https://www.instagram.com/samartoorr/
I think it was aliens. How do I know? I would refer to the fact that no aircraft has been shot down in the recent airstrikes - and we all know aliens have superior military technology. I don't think it was just luck. And of course it's a state secret - after all, it's aliens we're talking about.I think how they did it is a state secret, and I wouldn't post it if I knew. As to how the author knows it to be true, I would refer to the facts that no aircraft has been shoot down in the recent airstrikes. US and Israeli. I don't think it was just luck.
It could be a state secret. The author can elaborate on that through any number of ways to lend some credibility to his argument. For example, he could have qualified his statement with "based on my X years of experience as a military officer in the relevant field of Y" or "while the exact details behind 'why' are classified..."I think how they did it is a state secret, and I wouldn't post it if I knew. As to how the author knows it to be true, I would refer to the facts that no aircraft has been shoot down in the recent airstrikes. US and Israeli. I don't think it was just luck.
CIA pay offs as usual would be my guess. Not much else. Here is a reasonable sum to claim you and your men were suffering food poisoning at the time of attack .I think how they did it is a state secret, and I wouldn't post it if I knew. As to how the author knows it to be true, I would refer to the facts that no aircraft has been shoot down in the recent airstrikes. US and Israeli. I don't think it was just luck.
