hollywood pretty much never refers to the place. I think you know exactly what he meant.“….. the man noticeably known before becoming president as being a big rich, crude, fat cat businessman in NEW YORK is for the average joe? Lolol ok.”
hollywood pretty much never refers to the place. I think you know exactly what he meant.“….. the man noticeably known before becoming president as being a big rich, crude, fat cat businessman in NEW YORK is for the average joe? Lolol ok.”
It was a joke.hollywood pretty much never refers to the place. I think you know exactly what he meant.
my bad.It was a joke.
No worries. Its really my fault. Farcical probably doesn’t play well in text. I was just poking fun by ignoring his entire argument to nitpick the very end. All the political topics are always partisan and vehement.my bad.
" it was an attempt to overthrow the election. And trump was involved" Can you point me to one piece of evidence that President Trump told the crowd to violently go to the capital and take it over.No, what do YOU think would have happened if they got in there? (which, they didn't, never were going to, because they werent litterally let in with open arms.). Were they going to hang mike pence? I dont think so.
Also, why congress is investigating 1/6, is SPECIFICALLY because it was an attempt to overthrow the election. And trump was involved, CAPITOL POLICE WERE INVOLVED, the secret service was involved, and most of the republican party was invovled.
There is a congressional investigation for this because GF protesters were not part of a pre-meditated coup attempt by high ranking government officials.
It's not insider if the public knows of the actions. Aka if a grant is going to be given money to a company it goes through steps which are publically listed, and you yourself can do it.But it's ok for the Pelosi family to buy stock in a company just before congress is slated to give them grant money.
Indeed. It's only insider trading is if they make money off of information that is secret where the public doesn't know about it. Nancy Pelosi acted on public information any citizen can do.It's not insider if the public knows of the actions. Aka if a grant is going to be given money to a company it goes through steps which are publically listed, and you yourself can do it.
Yup because this is nothing to fear right?View attachment 2361
View attachment 2362View attachment 2363
Yup! She gonna overthrow the government!
Incredibly poor source and extremely bias.... just like CNN & FOX.
Yup because this is nothing to fear right?
Maybe but is it true? I believe it is.Incredibly poor source and extremely bias.... just like CNN & FOX.
I thought they are calling it an insurrection. I think it was a protest that turned into a riot. Under suspicious circumstances I might add.
Want to talk hypocrisy let's talk about how a mob of white people being violent is labeled a "protest" but when a crowd of people of color becomes violent it's a riot.
Aren't the secret service agents armed. I don't think they were afraid for their lives. Good rebuttal though. Those clips do look really bad and they should be prosecuted.Yup because this is nothing to fear right?
Funny how one results in arrest and investigations of who did what and months of investigations and prime time coverage.
Want to talk hypocrisy let's talk about how a mob of white people being violent is labeled a "protest" but when a crowd of people of color becomes violent it's a riot.
Idk I tried looking it up but can't seem to find the orginal story to see if its true. Then again I didn't look that hard.Maybe but is it true? I believe it is.
Not saying or trying to compare them. Just trying to find out why some people refuse to call it a riot when it clearly became one.Both we’re wrong but don’t piss down my back and tell me one was any worse.
Yes they are. But good luck trying to charge them with as hardly any precedent to prosecute on. Also a insurrection is a riot, just a politically motivated one...I thought they are calling it an insurrection.
I know of no one I respect that rejects the notion that if individuals who broke the law willfully and with violence at the capital should not be prosecuted.Not saying or trying to compare them. Just trying to find out why some people refuse to call it a riot when it clearly became one.
Yes they are. But good luck trying to charge them with as hardly any precedent to prosecute on. Also a insurrection is a riot, just a politically motivated one...