If GPS satellites are being shot down and you aren't already out of the Bay Area, you're too late.If I heard that GPS satellite are being shot down I'm in my bugout boat and getting as far away as possible from the Bay Area.
If GPS satellites are being shot down and you aren't already out of the Bay Area, you're too late.If I heard that GPS satellite are being shot down I'm in my bugout boat and getting as far away as possible from the Bay Area.
Well yes. I'm sure there would be a lead up to that and would have already pre-evacuated. Was making a statement. I'm borderline there if things turn south in Eastern Europe.If GPS satellites are being shot down and you aren't already out of the Bay Area, you're too late.
I was reading something about the sea stallion having multiple redundancy in navigation system. Not solely reliant on gps.US military is way too invested in GPS satellites. They need a system that doesn't rely on them.
As far as I know they are.Anyone know are Russian subs equipped with MRV missiles? If remember correctly they do because Russian missiles are rather inaccurate so more the merrier.
Oh I’m just making fun of the irony going to sea and the go to navigation tool is gone. I wasn’t even thinking of your skills.I know how to navigate. Have star charts as well.
Looked it up each Russian sub can carry from 4-10 MRV:As far as I know they are.
The Borei and Borei-A designs are Russia's most advanced ballistic missile submarines. ... The Delta IVs can be armed with up to 16 R-29RMU Sineva submarine-launched ballistic missiles, themselves capable of each carrying either 4 or 10 MIRVs, again depending on the warhead type. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/39953/three-russian-ballistic-missile-submarines-just-surfaced-through-the-arctic-ice-together#:~:text=The Borei and Borei-A,most advanced ballistic missile submarines.&text=The Delta IVs can be,depending on the warhead type.
Personally think you shouldn't own a boat on the seas unless you know how to navigate without GPS. Just in case anyways. You never know.Oh I’m just making fun of the irony going to sea and the go to navigation tool is gone. I wasn’t even thinking of your skills.
It’s like land navigation at night in wild.
If you don’t have good map or knowledge of area compass or clear sky’s your going in circles
All I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her byPersonally think you shouldn't own a boat on the seas unless you know how to navigate without GPS. Just in case anyways. You never know.all I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her by"
Russia's targeting technology was far behind ours, but they've caught up. That's why both Russia and the US have done away with the multi-megaton yield warheads. With precise targeting capabilities, four 250 kiloton warheads with overlapping blast radius can do way more damage than a single 1 megaton warhead, even thought the total expended yield is identical.Random question. Anyone know are Russian subs equipped with MRV missiles? If remember correctly they do because Russian missiles are rather inaccurate so more the merrier.
I was aware the US prefered smaller yield warheads but I had no idea that Russia had gone the same way. Has this ever been confirmed?Russia's targeting technology was far behind ours, but they've caught up. That's why both Russia and the US have done away with the multi-megaton yield warheads. With precise targeting capabilities, four 250 kiloton warheads with overlapping blast radius can do way more damage than a single 1 megaton warhead, even thought the total expended yield is identical.
The alleged 100 MT warhead on the submarine drone doesn't count, as it has a different purpose than airbursting over a city.
It's my understanding that due to both various strategic arms treaties and better weapons and guidance technologies, the US and Russia were down to 1 to 1.5 MT being the largest active warheads, and even those represent less than 3% of total active warheads. China still has 5 MT warheads in active service, but I think they are the only nuclear power still relying on those old large-yield weapons.I was aware the US prefered smaller yield warheads but I had no idea that Russia had gone the same way. Has this ever been confirmed?