• Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.

Pentagon Has ‘Off-World Vehicles Not Made on This Earth'

CreepyMonkey

Active member
Pentagon Has ‘Off-World Vehicles Not Made on This Earth'

Popular Mechanics • Andrew Daniels July 24, 2020


Photo credit: Department of Defense

Photo credit: Department of Defense
From Popular Mechanics
For years, the U.S. government has repeatedly changed its tune regarding its official involvement with UFO research.
As recently as February, a Pentagon spokesperson told Popular Mechanics that, while a government program did investigate unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and other unexplained aerial phenomena for some time last decade, funding dried up in 2012. But when Popular Mechanics thoroughly investigated the covert program, multiple sources said it’s still ongoing to this day.
Now, a new report in the New York Times confirms those accounts. The government’s UFO unit currently resides in the Office of Naval Intelligence, where it “deals with classified matters,” per the report, even though the unit itself isn’t classified. The Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force is meant to “standardize collection and reporting” on sightings of UAVs and publicly divulge “at least some of its findings” twice a year, according to the Times.

In a June Senate Committee Report, the Senate authorized appropriations for fiscal year 2021 for the task force, supporting its efforts to reveal any links that unidentified aerial phenomena “have to adversarial foreign governments, and the threat they pose to U.S. military assets and installations.”
From the report:
The Committee remains concerned that there is no unified, comprehensive process within the Federal Government for collecting and analyzing intelligence on unidentified aerial phenomena, despite the potential threat. The Committee understands that the relevant intelligence may be sensitive; nevertheless, the Committee finds that the information sharing and coordination across the Intelligence Community has been inconsistent, and this issue has lacked attention from senior leaders.
Therefore, the Committee directs the DNI, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of such other agencies as the Director and Secretary jointly consider relevant, to submit a report within 180 days of the date of enactment of the Act, to the congressional intelligence and armed services committees on unidentified aerial phenomena (also known as ‘‘anomalous aerial vehicles’’), including observed airborne objects that have not been identified.
Senator Marco Rubio, who chairs the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, told a CBS affiliate in Florida that he’s most interested to learn from the task force who’s responsible for unidentified aircraft spotted over American military bases. Rubio said he hopes “the Chinese or Russians or some other adversary” hasn’t made “some sort of technological leap” that “allows them to conduct this sort of activity.”

“That to me,” Rubio said, “is a national security risk and one we should be looking into.”
While such UAVs may very well come from foreign adversaries, the other possibility, of course, is that we can’t pinpoint their origins from anywhere on this planet. And that’s where the New York Times report gets really interesting.

Harry Reid, the former Nevada senator who was instrumental in funding the original UFO program, told the Times he believes that “crashes from other worlds had occurred, and that retrieved materials had been studied secretly for decades, often by aerospace companies under government contracts.” From the article:
“After looking into this, I came to the conclusion that there were reports— some were substantive, some not so substantive—that there were actual materials that the government and the private sector had in their possession.”
The astrophysicist Eric Davis, who consulted with the Pentagon’s original UFO program, told the Times that after he examined certain materials, he came to the conclusion that “we couldn’t make [them] ourselves.” In fact, Davis briefed a Department of Defense (DOD) agency as recently as March about retrieving materials from “off-world vehicles not made on this earth.”
The New York Times report, and the anticipated public disclosure of findings from Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force, are the latest in encouraging recent developments surrounding UFO research.

Back in April, the U.S. Navy officially published three videos that show unidentified aerial vehicles are genuine, several years after the notorious clips first leaked online and properly ushered in the UFO renaissance.

In 2019, the Navy confirmed the three videos, taken by Navy pilots, indeed show “unexplained aerial phenomena,” but the service also said the footage should have never been released to the public in the first place. Then in April, the service dropped the clips on its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) page, a repository for documents released under the federal law that allows for the full or partial disclosure of U.S. government information to the public.

The clips were first released in 2017 and 2018 by The New York Times and To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science, a UFO research group from former blink-182 member Tom DeLonge.
“After a thorough review,” a Pentagon spokesperson told Popular Mechanics in April, “the department has determined that the authorized release of these unclassified videos does not reveal any sensitive capabilities or systems, and does not impinge on any subsequent investigations of military air space incursions by unidentified aerial phenomena.”
DOD released the videos in order to “clear up any misconceptions by the public on whether or not the footage that has been circulating was real, or whether or not there is more to the videos.”
Popular Mechanics has reached out to the Pentagon for comment and will update this story accordingly.
 
Mind you, the above story came from the New York Times, which has unfortunately fallen pretty far from its once lofty perch as a purveyor of truth. However, I believe this story.
 
I mean, if true, that is amazing. But it also means that we are probably being watched by extra-terrestials right now. Hopefully they only have an academic interest in us, and have some form of "prime directive" against interfering with another species' development. Otherwise we might get to experience what it felt like to be the Aztec empire when the Spanish arrived.
 
It is all very fascinating to see coming to light now.
Not just the NY Times

None of it is conclusive about what we’re facing if anything. meaning is it actually alien, either of this universe, or as some maintena from a different dimension altogether, not of our known and recognized universe.

I don’t think it’s Russian or Chinese for two reasons.
By disqualify logic, if it was it would be on parade by them and already in use to diminish our military power projection. Or for a more practical or economic reason the use of this tech to lay claim and exploit the resources of the moon.
The second while neither countries are schmucks at tech or their ability to steal technology. I don’t believe either has made this kind of significant tech leap ahead of the US just from an R&D perspective. We’d see it in other platforms their unveiling, which as it is except for hypersonic is reutilization of existing tech.

So it comes back to what to make of all these revelations from gov agencies who for decades have steadfastly denied all this. To now we’re hearing yes it exist and maybe we have some crafts or parts of crafts and our military is encountering tech that far exceeds our own.
And no we don’t have any idea for sure where this technology came from although we’re relatively certain it didn’t come from earth.
Theyve basically in some of these reports admited “no we don’t necessarily own the skies”.
That’s really a lot to digest.

Their is also the argument out there that in reality the tech IS real but that it’s our own tech developed by DARPA. It’s not perfected or it is and being fielded now and this is a way for the Pentagon to slow walk the release of the tech.
This would follow somewhat they way the stealth fighter and bomber were revealed.
Sightings galore and matching denials.
Then oh look at what we have to bomb with impunity key targets over Baghdad.
 
It really is wild and I don’t know what to make of it all. Any of the possible answers are massive. We’re being visited by aliens.
We have unbelievable technology we’re about ready to reveal. Or they have made a massive mistake understanding what is going on here.
Hope it’s door #2
I also wonder if there’s any significance that it’s this admin it’s being revealed under.
If it’s Aliens then all of those earnest denials by previous administration seem pretty hollow right now.
 
I've heard a theory that hinting these developments are the result of extraterrestrial activity, is really just a bullshit narrative constructed to distract people from modern politics, particularly the whole Epstein/Maxwell debacle that could see multiple powerful people outed as pedophiles. Any thoughts?
 
I've heard a theory that hinting these developments are the result of extraterrestrial activity, is really just a bullshit narrative constructed to distract people from modern politics, particularly the whole Epstein/Maxwell debacle that could see multiple powerful people outed as pedophiles. Any thoughts?
Not just these debacles but all the other morally questionable activities that have occurred.... The technology behind these "Tic-Tacs" are very earthly indeed...the entire surface of these devices are piezoelectric(very likely PVDF), they function by moving the air around the skin of the craft with a surface traveling wave(Rayleigh wave) with the group wave velocity determining velocity...they essentially travel as a soliton wave so they do not create a shock wave and for all intent and purpose (as far as the atmosphere is concerned) they do not exist... they are a guarded secret for obvious reasons.... 1. because financial overheads for entry into developement is low enough for any small nation or corporation to access, and 2. the functionality is closely related to the gravitational analog of this vector trust regime...

Hint: group velocity can exceed the velocity of the wave speed through the medium........ You're welcome.....
 
The main materials in the "gravity analog" are very likely amorphous metals. If you are interested in why then look into 'modulus of resilience' and 'mechanical loss coefficient'...


High Frequency Gravity Wave (HFGW) communication is probably the single most tightly held secret within the sectors of government that operate with related principals. The Li-Baker detector is by no means an efficient way to achieve HFGW communication. Thus why this technology will remain fringe....that and the obvious danger from G.A.S.E.R.'s

The "Tic Tac's" though are not so complicated..
 
My take? there's no way this is by the russians or the chinese. This has to be from off world. Impossible for them to make something like that so bloody quickly.
 
...... This has to be from off world ....
When we haven't even properly explored many terrestrial locations and much of the oceans depths... this is why the likes of people like Elon musk humour me, such arrogance and irresponsibility to his fellow humans and the only planet we know for certain harbors life.

...... Impossible for them to make something like that so bloody quickly.
Foo fighters have been around since the mid 40's in the public consciousness...this is just another iteration...nothing quick about it 70+ years
 
Top