- Joined
- Sep 6, 2022
- LOCATION
- Fly over country
So if the Zionist nationalist in Israel held such control of Israel’s foreign policy. Specifically that Israel was to rule from the Nile to the Euphrates. Why is it virtually everytime Israel has gained control of new land after having been invaded. They end up giving all or part of it back to the Nation State that invaded them.In fact, what Israel wants is:
The current political vision: Israel and all Palestinian territories (West Bank and Gaza Strip). Used by the Israeli right and far right, particularly under the term "Judea and Samaria," to legitimize settlement activity.
The maximal vision (From the Nile to the Euphrates): Israel, Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon, and parts of Syria, Egypt, and Iraq. A literal interpretation of Genesis, largely marginalized but present in some radical messianic movements.
The exception being the Golan Heights, which was tactical.
Why not spend this energy looking for the boogie man who drove a secular Lebanon into civil war in the 80’s or Syria in 10’s, tried to do the same in Egypt as well.
Seems the true political and nationalist actions in the Mideast don’t come from Zionism but from islamism and their desire to restore the Caliphate.
