Out of context and not looking at entirety of my post today. My First use proposal was used as sarcasm in response to repeated insinuations from Russia that they might use nuclear weapons to salvage their failed military adventurism in Ukraine.
NO I am not proposing first strike tactically or strategically. But I would also expect Russia to quit using repeated threats of nuclear weapons to impose their force of will on independent nations.
How reckless and dangerous of Russia to keep threatening nuclear attacks on others. It is Russia that has no concern for the well-being or future its own citizens to constantly be threatening to attack other nations. And for what? They don’t trust Russia and have chosen to join NATO.
Well why would they trust Russia given Russia’s actions this last year.
Russia made their case to Europe and Ukraine. It was rejected, rejection is not justification for invasion. That is the actions of a nation who places little value on human life.
I will tell you first hand as someone who is on the forefront of some of the shit going on...most of the nations you are talking about aren't independent in the ways you think.
You'll have a nation who's "independent" like Ukraine who aren't super affiliated. You'll have both the FSB, CIa (sometimes mossad, sometimes the Chinese ministry) attempt to join in and throw money at high ranking political leaders to get them to enforce pro...blank country, and blank country benefiting treaties because they are in debt. The same thing goes on in American politics at a smaller scale, but we are focusing on a nation scale.
If the CIA/China/mossad/mi6/germ Intel/gsb win a country and it becomes aligned with them...the country is typically defended politically, militarily, and economically..such as Iran and Russia...or Syria and Russia. You'll have a first party and a second party... We will say Russia is the first party and Syria/Iran are a second party.
The first party will ultimately benefit more compared to the second party because the "independent country" is a puppet because it's indebt to the group that holds a majority of office canadates debt.
This is the exact reason why if any of you grow up and try to get a Clarence you must avoid debt by all means.. debt makes you a pawn or a second party who has to bust it for a first party.
America and Russia fought for ukrane on many fronts in the political spectrum, but we won because our connections and money going into Ukraine was better so we had an America aligning president instilled which allows us to extort Ukraine and Russia can't.
Russia considers this a threat because of American expansion, and the lack of ability for them to have a future chance at flipping Ukraine with money or politically because if Ukraine is admitted to nato..it's a no go ground for Russia to do those political influencing campaigns.
Nato is so good because we do this with most of the countries, and with Russia lashing out it makes it easier for us to grip more people under our umbrella.
If you take a look ay any country that associates with America, china, Russia... Politically...you'll see that country getting exploited majorly by one of the three states we call a first party.
When you allow your country to be influenced politically by a first party, you lose independence...once again I'm not attempting to kick a hornets nest...but when Donald trump won..it wasn't rigged or election fraud...it was simply him winning an election... Though the underlying problem was he had supposed debt to Russians which made him succeptable to being given offers to repay the debt by enforcing pro Russia policy... If it comes between paying back cash or pulling strings..people will pull strings... Because.moeny is the ultimate status symbol.
If we take a look at the history throughout time during Soviet union, and modern day Russia/America...we can see this means of political flipping still going on worldwide. We did this same exact thing in Syria/viet/korea... And this doesn't make it good for Russia either..I'm stating the facts.
I really wish I could dump doccuments detailing this on a bigger scale, but I'm not going to lose my job, nor face giving up my current role.
All I can do is give the theoretical, and hypothetical..
Russia is going to do this till the win removing the us funded politicians Which will allow them to do a political takeover (but it's going it be harder because zlin banned opposition parties). Or they prevent Ukraine from joinning nato so they still have a future chance of flipping the country.
Russia has constantly reiterated this in their own right because fucking with a nato country leads to nothing good, and it carries a lot more risks. This finland thing could make it worse because once again..they consider it expansion, and a locking of idology without an ability to change it with ease)
