Should also be noted I saw no mentioning of these two new strike groups moving to M.E where to relive the already tremendous amount of firepower/assests already in the region. Meaning their adding, not rotating with this move. KEY NOTE.
Shhhhhh, be very very kwyat….Should also be noted I saw no mentioning of these two new strike groups moving to M.E where to relive the already Is tremendous amount of firepower/assests already in the region. Meaning their adding, not rotating with this move. KEY NOTE.
That’s a three month extension to the Vinson’s group Vinson is supposed to be on station by end of month.Here's the sources I posted in other thread for my claims of two strike groups moving to M.E:
Hegseth beefs up warship presence in the Middle East and will have 2 aircraft carriers in the region. -AP
Hegseth beefs up warship presence in the Middle East and will have 2 aircraft carriers in the region
A U.S. official says Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is beefing up the Navy warship presence in the Middle East, ordering two aircraft carriers to be there next month as the U.S. increases strikes on Yemen-based Houthi rebels.apnews.com
BREAKING NEWS: Two US carrier strike groups headed to the Middle East.
U.S. officials have informed the AP that the U.S. plans to position two carrier strike groups, USS Harry S. Truman and the soon-to-arrive USS Carl Vinson, in the Middle East. The Defense Secretary has directed these deployments to strengthen the U.S. military presence in the area, including an extension of the USS Harry S. Truman's mission.
Thanks AP was vague. Didn't specify, at least on the quick skim on the article I read.
Should also be noted I saw no mentioning of these two new strike groups moving to M.E where to relive the already tremendous amount of firepower/assests already in the region. Meaning their adding, not rotating with this move. KEY NOTE.
Yep, they either have a nuke or balls bigger than the camels they rode in on. One thing I know for sure, the Iranian navy has no room for threats, so they would need to be relying heavily on ground launched missiles against any potential ships.
I wonder if Iran getting a nuclear weapon will be an advantage or disadvantage for Russia.
The former. They are in a quasi alliance, after all - in fact, they have just signed a treaty on comprehensive strategic partnership. And if Iran breaks the nuclear taboo, Putin will largely avoid the stigma if/when he follows suit.
There was a x post last night about a large amount of air tanker and transport planes flying westbound across the pacific.
Looks like a forward deployment to Diego Garcia
Moved both your posts here from Signal Gate & General Report Thread here.
Might be both right?
100%.
If Turkey knows what's best, wishes to stay in NATO/EU, and buy American F35's, they will more then happily turn on Iran and it's proxy terrorists Hamas & Hezbollah. They never cared anyways, this thing called freinds of convenience. Iran convenience ran out clearly.
I concur with this assessment. Do not forget that Iran publicly put a price on Trump's head during his first term. I doubt he has forgotten about that. Two CSGs and at least seven B2s in theater means something is coming. Since Diego Garcia only has facilities for four B2s, that means at least three are out in the open, not inside hangars. To me, this indicates that whatever is coming will be sooner than later.
