- Joined
- Aug 11, 2010
- defconwarningsystem
- DEFCONWSALERTS
- YOUTUBE
- DefconWarningSystem
It's not like they haven't done this how many times now?
It's not like they haven't done this how many times now?
Eleventeen!It's not like they haven't done this how many times now?
Same thing as a "concept of a plan."What the heck is a perimeter of a deal? How is it any different from the last 5 or so deals?![]()
If it's clichés the US administration is seeking to invoke, may I suggest "the boy who cried wolf"?Same thing as a "concept of a plan."
Responding to President Trump's comments about Iran being duplicitous, I must ask the following question:Who is being duplicitous?
![]()
Live Updates: Despite Trump's remarks, no new negotiations with Iran are planned, U.S. officials tell CBS News
President Trump, who called Tehran "unbelievably duplicitous," said the talks are the "last chance" for Iran to forge a deal and avoid an escalation.www.cbsnews.com
Live Updates: Despite Trump's remarks, no new negotiations with Iran are planned, U.S. officials tell CBS News
Despite President Trump's continued comments that negotiations with Iran are set to begin on Monday, U.S. officials have told CBS News that there are no "new" or novel negotiations planned.
Mr. Trump called Iran's leadership "unbelievably duplicitous" Monday after Iran said hours earlier it had no plans to hold direct talks with Washington, despite the U.S. leader's claim that negotiations would start today.
My understanding is that the Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei sets the red lines and has final say, while President Masoud Pezeshkian and his ministers can only negotiate with the US after receiving explicit permission from the Supreme Leader.Responding to President Trump's comments about Iran being duplicitous, I must ask the following question:
Assuming the duplicity originates with Iran (some might argue the duplicity is elsewhere), is it a sign or symptom of a political power struggle between the "elected" government (I.e. the President and his ministers) and the supreme leader/IRGC? Could it be that the "elected" government is more willing to negotiate than the hard line leader / IRGC?
Good observation. Hm.Almost predictable at this point.
1. Make major threat
2. Cancel said threat at the last minute
3. Claim it was because somebody asked you to.
4. Rinse and repeat the next week.
Midterms.The U.S./Iran war is another example of the U.S. starting a war but refusing to actually carry out a war.
Ground Combat is a thing, IMHOMy spider sense is tingling. I'm seeing allot of reports of hinky movements in countries surrounding iran. Just saying.![]()
timeskuwait.com
Today's forecast for the Strait of Hormuz: Two frontal boundaries of hot air are once again expected to collide over the Strait of Hormuz today and tomorrow, with US optimism clashing with Iranian denials. By Friday or Saturday, the area over Iran will once again turn hot as the US optimism quickly fades, resulting in an 80% chance of threatening rhetoric, with a 50% chance of bombs raining across the entire Middle East over the weekend. A new cold front is predicted to move into the area by next Monday, bringing an end to the end and a fresh round of optimism and denials. We expect this weather pattern to continue ad infinitum for the next few weeks.Axios: A preliminary agreement is imminent to reopen the Strait of Hormuz
“The United States, Iran, and Oman are nearing a preliminary agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to maritime traffic, according to Axios. Washington is expected to formally announce the agreement on Wednesday…”
Axios: A preliminary agreement is imminent to reopen the Strait of Hormuz
Important developments regarding the agreement between the United States, Iran and the Sultanate of Oman, and its impact on shipping traffic in the Strait of Hormuz.www.voiceofemirates.com
Hard to see any country fighting our wars for us again given our treatment of those in the region post Afghan pullout. Saudi Arabia does not have the capacity to mount a ground offensive into Iran proper, unless they somehow find a way to rigidize their oil infrastructure from unconventional attacks they won't apply the pressure needed to win this war on the ground.Ground Combat is a thing, IMHO
Reports of unidentified drones over Diego Garcia are raising new questions about the vulnerability of one of the U.S. military’s most strategically important—and remote—installations.
The U.K. Ministry of Defence confirmed it was aware of the reported sightings but provided no details. U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM) likewise declined to discuss the incident or force-protection measures.
The reports originated with an unofficial Air Force social media account, which claimed drones had been spotted near the base’s fuel farm and that a 0700–1900 curfew had been imposed. TWZ says it has not independently verified those claims.
The timing is significant. Diego Garcia was already considered a priority target for Iran, with F-16s deployed to the island in February specifically for protection against one way attack drones and cruise missiles. Iran subsequently launched two ballistic missiles at the installation during Operation Epic Fury, though neither hit the base.
The reported drone sightings highlight a different threat: long range or sea launched drones that could reach isolated bases far from conventional launch points. Diego Garcia sits roughly 1,000 miles from Sri Lanka and has virtually no civilian population that could plausibly account for recreational drone activity.
Whose drones were they. I would look farther to the east. IMOIn the past, Diego Garcia has been a temporary home for strategic U.S. bombers and has been used to reload U.S. Navy Arleigh Burke calss guided missile destroyer vertical launch system (VLS) cells with munitions like the SM-6 and Tomahawk.
![]()
Drone Sightings Are Happening At Diego Garcia, America's Remote Strategic Island Outpost
The sightings highlight concerns about drone attacks from the sea, especially at a time of extreme hostility between Iran and the U.S.www.twz.com
Interesting statement.| MOSSAD: WE VISITED THE FORDOW NUCLEAR SITE MANY TIMES
The former head of Mossad, Yossi Cohen, stated: "We visited the Fordow nuclear site many times to understand it. The U.S. bombing of the place is the realization of all my dreams.
- The X post by pro-Israel user
@isaacrrr7
accurately reports ex-Mossad chief Yossi Cohen's fresh statement from the Galilee Conference, where he revealed Mossad "toured" Iran's underground Fordow nuclear site many times to understand it.- Cohen called the June 2025 US strike on Fordow—using B-2 bombers and bunker-buster bombs during the Israel-Iran war—"the fulfillment of all my dreams," reflecting long-term Israeli intelligence focus on the facility.
- He also assessed that Iran's 60% enriched uranium stockpile is still far from bomb-ready, providing context on post-strike damage assessments after the US targeted Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.
He also assessed that Iran's 60% enriched uranium stockpile is still far from bomb-ready, providing context on post-strike damage assessments after the US targeted Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.
Im not sure where this is going or supposed to go.
Current and former U.S. officials said Israel supplied multiple warnings during the past year alleging Iranian plots against President Trump, including proposed sniper, knife and shoulder launched missile attacks.
The CIA could not corroborate several allegations and assessed some with low confidence. Turkey reportedly found no evidence supporting a separate warning involving Trump’s July visit. Israel denied attempting to influence U.S. policy.
