• Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.

🗣️ | U.S. Potential Intervention in Cuba | ANALYSIS OF REPORTS

Better luck this time 😉
Anyone know the goal this time for sure? Or another half a dozen different reasons with hope one has success to claim.
take a look at cause and effect Global Escalation
“A short version escalation report. it could scary, remeber the world condition is fluid, Nothing written in stone . This only speaks to what is and math formulas to resolve outcome.”
Cuba is an ingrediant… 🤔💫food for thought,,
 
Let’s be clear of one thing irrespective of trumps bombastic statements.
Cuba has been in a structural economic decline since the 90’s.
The curtailing of Venezuelan support stopped long before Maduro was removed.
So are we whining that US and now Venezuelan policies are no longer going to SUBSIDIZE a failed economic system and economy.
We’re actually supposed to feel sorry for socialism. And yes by extension I mean those who are affected by these failed socialist policies. How many more decades should the failed socialist experiment in Cuba be subsidized. And by extension how many Cubans should remain trapped in this failed socialist economy and gov.
The Economic Crisis in Cuba, Its Causes, and Migration. | Cuba Capacity Building Project
 
Let’s be clear of one thing irrespective of trumps bombastic statements.
Cuba has been in a structural economic decline since the 90’s.
The curtailing of Venezuelan support stopped long before Maduro was removed.
So are we whining that US and now Venezuelan policies are no longer going to SUBSIDIZE a failed economic system and economy.
We’re actually supposed to feel sorry for socialism. And yes by extension I mean those who are affected by these failed socialist policies. How many more decades should the failed socialist experiment in Cuba be subsidized. And by extension how many Cubans should remain trapped in this failed socialist economy and gov.
The Economic Crisis in Cuba, Its Causes, and Migration. | Cuba Capacity Building Project
i see a strange pattern of failed struggling countries that have been targets of US for decades, through so many avenues to keep them weak and stop growth and independence purposely . So blaming such countries for still surviving through such harsh situations mainly caused by deliberate outside interference dosn't surprise me for a second. Especially when the ones responsible are the ones commenting eg. US . Since the 90s? I would have thought earlier much earlier considering actions taken since soviet run in . Ah call it as you will.
 
What was that you said a bit ago about the US becoming Germany in 1939 with the Iran war?

Ding ding ding...

This kind of aggressive imperialism, constant unexplained or poorly explained belligerent actions and rhetoric against sovereign foreign nations some completely inexplicable and others just inadvisable continues to erode the world's trust in the US and the stability of general relative peace that we have enjoyed for decades.
 
What was that you said a bit ago about the US becoming Germany in 1939 with the Iran war?

Ding ding ding...

This kind of aggressive imperialism, constant unexplained or poorly explained belligerent actions and rhetoric against sovereign foreign nations some completely inexplicable and others just inadvisable continues to erode the world's trust in the US and the stability of general relative peace that we have enjoyed for decades.
Is it about interventurism? China has/had interests in Cuba Venezuela, Iran Pakistan many latin american countries,
I think you on onto it,
Expand on it , if you can…🤔
 
Is it about interventurism? China has/had interests in Cuba Venezuela, Iran Pakistan many latin american countries,
I think you on onto it,
Expand on it , if you can…🤔
So China inserts itself in various third world countries and everyone twitters their fingers and sighs oh my.
But the US responds to counter those action and it Hitler in 39.
 
So China inserts itself in various third world countries and everyone twitters their fingers and sighs oh my.
But the US responds to counter those action and it Hitler in 39.
Once upon a time the US did it the same way, much quieter, almost , China learned from this and lost as well( Chin/viet)
They are even better at being quiet by calling it Belt and road.

Oh My? Because we didnt watch it on the headlines, you read it on the third page,,,,
Now enter the new way of social media narrative control, BIG , Flashy, Beautiful,
No way! In your face. style!!!

So the US leadership take a decisive roll in squashing the bad guys China Iran, gosh , right now irs pretty tough to even define that now🤔
Doing it big and bold got the attention of the world, needless ill will to the good people of the USA,

Is the real direction subdue Chinese expansionism? Good Plan, Thwart Russian Imperialism , I have my doubts
Increase campaign contributors wealth,
Deeds speak!!
The world did not follow up on the 1994 accord to support the Ukraine in a timely manner ( Russian included)

If control of oil and minerals and driving competitors out of markets, is the end game of all this,

Thus the way the leadership of the US is going closely approximates the styles of many other authoritarian leader of past. (Not thats a great history read)

Up to and including appeasement protocols to support diplomacy.
 
Belt and road.
Which should be added or noted at least that it failed miserably. China has by and large stopped funding major infrastructure projects and has drawn back existing ones in foreign countries.

China has realized which they should have from the beginning that they are not going to get much out of it and even the little political sway they get from it isn't really enough of a return in the billions and billions and billions they're spending.

Anyway point being is the Belt and road is dead. China isn't investing in new infrastructure in that initiative and existing initiatives are being drawn back. Because the gains have turned out to be marginal at best.

HOWEVER, doesn't mean China has stopped per-se their "global soft power movement".... They're still "investing" in these regions. But they're doing it in a different way, not via infrastructure projects anymore. But that's another topic/story.
 
So China inserts itself in various third world countries and everyone twitters their fingers and sighs oh my.
But the US responds to counter those action and it Hitler in 39?!
I’m so sick of this mamby pamby every thing the US does paralysis.

Talk about Russian or chines propaganda or influence campaigns to counter the interest of the US.
And everyone believes it’s so libertarian or independent of themselves.

It’s interventionist of the US to influence what’s going on in Cuba.
When it’s also been stated approved and legislatively voted on by the US for 50 years.
This is not Trump pulling a Hitler. Its Trump trying to implement standing US foreign policy of decades

Yes I am against forever wars and nation building.
I’m and have been against destabilizing totalitarian gov if it was stable and not feeding terrorist actions elsewhere.

I always argued that to prevail in Afghanistan or Iraq the poison of the theocratic mullahs and IRGC had to be crushed.
That three presidents tried to fight that fight backwards with a blindfold on is a tragedy. Real global terrorism started with the creation of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The very definition of political Islam.
 
Which should be added or noted at least that it failed miserably. China has by and large stopped funding major infrastructure projects and has drawn back existing ones. China has realized which they should have from the beginning that they are not going to get much out of it and even the little political sway they get from it isn't really enough of return in the billions and billions and billions they're spending.

Anyway point being is the Belt and road is dead. China isn't investing in new infrastructure in that initiative and existing initiatives are being drawn back. Because the games have turned out to be marginal at best.
The biggest benefit has been coercing their B&R dudes into rejecting Taiwan as a country and accepting China 1 policy,
Economic control , perfect,
Controls on Russia, perfect
Coersion in the failed state UN, perfect
Eventual action on Taiwan, closing in(?)

Control all goods into big oke USA, perfect
Crap, i could go on

B&R a loss on one spectrum , a qualified win on the other
 
Back
Top Bottom