• Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.

Iran and the bomb

william

Power Poster IV
Donator
Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Would russia, china or north korea help iran in the development of one? Are we in for a November surprise? What do the intelligence agencies know? I know MOSSAD is really good at penetrating iran operations. What exactly is going on in pickaxe mountain and why wasn't it collapsed already? Would iran dare to use one knowing the full weight of American and Israeli nuclear arsenals? Just how bad is this next phase of the war going to get? All questions I have in my mind.
 
Iran claims it is preparing to unveil a new weapon it calls the "Father of All Bombs."
The U.S., for its part, has the "Mother of All Bombs."

Oh! I’m just waiting for the "Child of All Bombs" now (sarcasm).
I’m highlighting the stupidity of both countries here.
 
Interesting podcast I'm putting out here for analysis.
Here is a summary of his account:

• The back-and-forth movement of Russian scientists

Tardio has presented a precise timeline to support his thesis:
• The deployment of experts: The Russian Foreign Minister traveled to Tehran to officially announce the dispatch of Russian scientists to Iran.
• An emergency extraction: Immediately afterward, Moscow dispatched military cargo planes to urgently evacuate these same scientists. Matt Tardio explicitly raises the question of what was secretly loaded onto these Russian cargo planes just before their departure, implying a transfer of sensitive technologies or materials.


The claim that Iran’s nuclear capability has been realized

This warning from Tardio coincides with statements from an Iranian member of parliament (Mohammad-Saleh Jokar) requesting authorization to use atomic weapons—at a time when the regime is now claiming to possess nuclear arms. The former Green Beret believes that Iran has crossed the technological point of no return, thanks to assistance from external parties.


The contradiction in Donald Trump’s position

This assertion by Matt Tardio is part of his broader criticism of the White House’s foreign policy:
• Donald Trump had publicly claimed that Vladimir Putin promised him that Russia “would not sell weapons to Iran.”
• Tardio directly contradicts this account, arguing that the U.S. President is turning a blind eye to Russia’s duplicity. He accuses Russia of continuing to support Tehran’s military and nuclear infrastructure in exchange for Iranian oil, while the United States continues to indirectly purchase diesel fuel from Russia. For him, this Russian technical assistance is the missing piece that enabled Iran to accelerate its program to achieve an operational nuclear deterrent capability.
 
I am not going to listen to his hour podcast. Does he present any evidence that Iran has "approved" nuclear weapons?
I think the only way you're going to know for sure is when one is detonated. Mr. Tardio goes into detail about why he believes russia has given a nuclear warhead to iran just in the last few days. He is claiming that russia finished refining the uranium they took out of iran under the obama administration and returned it to iran as a warhead. He also explains why they would do this with various documents and videos. Here is a screen shot from the video.
MovieMaker Untitled.jpg
I know that is hard to read. The font is so small, and I had to enlarge it a bit. Here is another one I found that is easier to read saying the same thing.
This video clip iran just released either yesterday or the day before.
He also says it could all be propaganda put out by iran, but he does lay out a very convincing case as to why he believes iran has a warhead and russia gave it to them just recently.
 
He also says it could all be propaganda put out by iran, but he does lay out a very convincing case as to why he believes iran has a warhead and russia gave it to them just recently.
In short, Matt Tardio uses real-world events—such as statements made by a member of parliament and the evacuation of scientists—to construct a speculative, high-reach scenario; however, international observers and field data do not support his conclusion.
 
Iran has made no such claim. Though I recall someone within Iran saying so. Outside the dissident group who claimed Iran had one years ago.
Well, you have a report of irainian government officials requesting the use of nuclear weapons, you have iran releasing a video of launching a nuclear strike, you have a knowledgeable military man claiming iran just got a nuclear weapon, probably more than one made from their own enriched uranium from russia and now you have iran threating to depopulate Isreal in under an hour.
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck!

Believe me though, I really, really hope this is all just BS propaganda.

  • Iranian lawmaker Ebrahim Azizi, chairman of parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, warned that any Israeli action against Iran's security would result in "depopulation of the occupied territories" in under an hour, posting alongside a map of Israeli infrastructure targets.
  • The map marks key sites including desalination plants, power stations, oil refineries, major bridges, the Dimona nuclear center, and an oil pipeline route, framing them as vulnerable in potential escalation.
  • @MOSSADil, an Israel-focused commentary account, highlights the statement as explicit genocidal intent while questioning selective application of international legal standards on such threats.
 
TEHRAN'S FRIDAY PRAYER LEADER IS OPENLY CALLING FOR A RETHINK OF THE COUNTRY’S NUCLEAR DOCTRINE
Tehran Friday Prayer Leader Hojjatoleslam Mohammad Javad Haj Ali Akbari urged Iranian experts to propose changes directly to the Supreme Leader. He argued Iran’s enemies have crossed red lines and broken previous agreements.He also cited polling that he says shows more than 70% of Iranians support changing the doctrine.
Meanwhile, parliament is reportedly considering at least 10 proposals to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. No official decision has been made, and Tehran continues to insist its nuclear program is peaceful. But Iran’s nuclear debate is clearly moving into territory that used to be politically taboo. The previous supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, had a religious fatwa against nukes, while the new leader, his son Mojtaba, has so far left the doctrine unresolved, refusing to publicly reaffirm or discard his father’s ban.
  • Mario Nawfal highlights Tehran Friday Prayer Leader Hojjatoleslam Mohammad Javad Haj Ali Akbari's sermon calling for a review of Iran's nuclear doctrine, framing it as a national demand with over 70% public support in cited polls and urging experts to submit proposals to Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei.
  • The remarks cite Iran's adversaries crossing red lines, including the assassination of former leader Ali Khamenei and broken agreements, while parliament weighs multiple proposals to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
  • This discussion breaks previous taboos around Iran's nuclear policy, as the new leader has not reaffirmed his father's religious fatwa against nuclear weapons, amid ongoing insistence that the program remains peaceful.
 
Back
Top Bottom