- Joined
- Aug 11, 2010
- defconwarningsystem
- DEFCONWSALERTS
- YOUTUBE
- DefconWarningSystem
What do you think of this ruling?
Basically, the judge ruled that the organisation did not disclose that because it did not disclose that it was a Jewish organisation and that it funded mostly kids outside of California, and that its jungle was stripped of all essential facts.
What say you? Right or wrong on the Judge's part?
Basically, the judge ruled that the organisation did not disclose that because it did not disclose that it was a Jewish organisation and that it funded mostly kids outside of California, and that its jungle was stripped of all essential facts.
What say you? Right or wrong on the Judge's part?
