- Joined
- Apr 4, 2021
What Volodin says it's not a fact...is propaganda...Volodin every 2/3 months as soon as there's an occasion he comes out with random threats of, global catastrophe, nuclear war, blah blah.
There's only a person that really counts ATM in Russia...Putin.
So what matters is what Putin, Lavrov and Peskov say.
You keep saying that this was an attack...to be an attack, you need two things: an attacker and someone who takes the takes the merit of the attack.
Both are missing.
And anyway...why would Ukraine attack the Kremlin, knowing that Putin is not even there? What would they gain?
If you're so sure that something big will happen, why don't you make an example?
What could happen worse than what's currently already happening? A nuclear attack? A chemical attack? Bombing Zelensky's home?
Does any of these responses make any sense? And would have Russia something to gain from something like that?
Also...do you realize that Ukraine has performed several attacks on Belgorod's region during the past months?
The fact "that someone will continue to make other similar attacks without risk", mostly does not apply in wars....there's a reason if Ukraine is not attacking Moscow, and SP which are pretty close.
No reason to try to kill Putin, knowing that he wasn't even there.
If you wanna wear the thin helmet for this drone's story...go ahead...
I don't undestand how it is possible that the DEFCON statements are so rational, when the level of the debate, even from some analysts, is that.
You confuse Volodim for Medvedev. However, Volodim is not the first random dude passing through the street: it is the President of the State Duma. So, if he say something, we can infer that maybe Duma is called to make some decisions.
It seems that for some of you all is like a joke. This IS an attack. It could be a false flag to simulate an attack, or it is a real attack. In every any case, it is an attack to an istitutional facility. So, in any case you can read this, it is something serious and it is obvious.
I do. And so, what you do you mean? First: Begorod it is not an istitutional facility. Second: this have to be read as a futher excalation, not as "nothing".
we can make a lot of examples, ranging from "nothing", to a "declaration of war", passing by a "further mobilization".
If the drone was Ukranian, they have acatually attacked Moscow. And if it is true that we don't know if it was a false flag, it is also true that we don't know if it wasn't. And even in the case in which it is a false flag, why Russians have made a false flag? To do nothing? It is obvious that if it is a Russian false flag, it is because Russia is searching a pretext to do something! You are so overthinking about how much Russia is bad and how much is bad someone who don't suddenly reports slavishly the first thing that ridiculize more Russia, that you really don't undestand the general scenario, which it is serious in both cases. In a summary, you postion is the following: Russian have surely made a false flag, because they are stupid. And they have made a false flag in order to do nothing, because they have nothing to do, because they are stupid. Great! Ok.
The fact that Putin wasn't even here don't demostrate that they known that he wasn't there. And if it was a false flag, why don't make it with Putin present? However, it is an istitutional facility in the Cremlin, inside Moscow.
Last edited:
