• Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.

NATO Will Respond if Russia Uses WMD's

DEFCON Warning System said:
I think Biden also said (though a surrogate) that it would depend on how big of an attack it was.
Click to expand...
He actually said it directly. The type of attack would determine the type of response. I did read a western official said it was unlikely NATO would become involved even in a chemical attack on Ukraine, but take that for what it's worth.
 
DarkNoon said:
It's still on the table now officially for NATO to intervene... They have drawn a line.
Click to expand...
Oh sure, it's on the table. Has been for a bit.

If Russia attacks chemically, what are we looking at. What did they do in Syria?
 
DEFCON Warning System said:
I think Biden also said (though a surrogate) that it would depend on how big of an attack it was.
Click to expand...
I understand the statement but that's like me saying I'll only call the fire department if the fire spreads past my kitchen. Like no if you're gonna go full force go for it. Russia would totally take the advantage if the US and NATO only halfass it.
 
DEFCON Warning System said:
What did they do in Syria?
Click to expand...
Yes that is what worries me. I know our missiles have the best accuracy. But sometimes our intel is not acurate on the battle field. We could easily kill Russians with the type of retaliatory responce for Chemical Weapons as we did in Syria.

What would we hit? We would have to hit Russian hardware to prevent another WMD attack. It's not like its rebel or Ukraine hardware using WMDs.
 
DarkNoon said:
What would we hit? We would have to hit Russian hardware to prevent another WMD attack. It's not like its rebel or Ukraine hardware using WMDs.
Click to expand...
In Syria it was easy to hit back because we just struck Syrian targets. Only enemy targets in Ukraine are Russian using Russian flags, can't retaliate without hitting Russian assets.
 
DarkNoon said:
In Syria it was easy to hit back because we just struck Syrian targets. Only enemy targets in Ukraine are Russian using Russian flags, can't retaliate without hitting Russian assets.
Click to expand...
There is only two ways to respond hit Russian concentrations in Ukraine or bases in Belarus or Russia that are launching from.
And then decide if it will simply be a show of force or a hurt.
It’s a tough call.
At this point it is most important and unequivocal that there would be a response. It is the only path open to dissuade them.
 
If you remember back in Syria, Biden was the hawk in Obama’s ear telling him he should do more. If the decision was up to Biden alone, I think we would see military intervention with a nerve gas attack. The wild card is NATO. They have the most to lose in a very short period of time and could get cold feet. The US could go it alone but I doubt they will.
 
It's better to use full force against Russia from the start to end this quickly but now is a bad time for war preparations, these unfavourable war conditions do not allow a surprise attack and a full nuclear response is highly probable.
But there is no doubt about that Russia will lose everything, if China and the EU do not enter the nuclear exchange the outcome for the world could be a little better.
 
RiffRaff said:
Nuclear response.
Click to expand...
If you want to launch nukes you don't need a reason by using cw against own troops. Seriously.
The nukes can fly without reason, simply because you realise who the hell do you answer to after . Realising nuke retaliation on Russia while America and Europe are nuked. How long before you get arrested after global nuclear exchange. 🤣😂🤣
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom