• Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.

North Korea Wants More Nuclear Weapons. Should We Be Concerned?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ahhhaha , Irag8er reports a 'dislike without comment' because he has no arguments.

Yet another proof that the moderators of this forum suffer from bias.
For the rest of the West, the USA is the most dangerous.

Lack of response = lack of willing to waste me time.
Such a simpleminded statement is not worth the effort to try and rebut.
"What happens when an unstoppable force - realty- meets an immovable object -you- it richochets and moves on.
 
I don't think it's fair to say the USA is more dangerous to the West than North Korea.

Last time I checked the US respects human rights a whole lot more than the North Koreans.
In terms of pure military might, sure, the US is a lot more dangerous, but I trust the US a hell of a lot more with their military than Kim Jong-Un.
 
Also the staff here do a decent job of letting voices be heard, if @Irag8er wanted he could delete all the messages here and ban people he disagrees with, but he doesn't.
Sure he has opinions but I don't think it's leading to biased moderation.

On a final note, problems with the staff are best discussed in private
 
Not right now, but economically yes, your beloved president is trying to kill us Canadians economically. The economy is the lifeblood of any war.
This is an interesting statement. Is it your position that the U.S. or any country has an obligation to Canada to trade or alter their economy to be fair to you?

Can the U.S. not do what it wants with its own money and policies? Or is that a privilege reserved only for Canadians?
 
He is proving the USA is no longer a trustworthy friend or ally and the world is starting to realise this.
I would have to agree with you.

Conversely, a lot of US allies weren't terribly trustworthy, either.
 

Doctrine and Leadership Statements​

North Korea’s leadership portrays its nuclear arsenal as purely defensive deterrence, but its official policy allows force in a range of situations. Kim Jong Un has repeatedly framed nukes as shields against “aggression by the United States and its vassal forces”. He vows never to be “first to use” nuclear weapons as long as the US stops insisting on disarmament – though that pledge is conditional on American behaviour.

In September 2022 Pyongyang codified its doctrine in a new nuclear law. This law proclaims a duty to use nuclear weapons in two cases: first, if North Korean strategic assets or leadership face imminent attack; and second, to “gain the initiative” in a war. In practice, analysts read this as a significantly lowered threshold for first use. The law explicitly rejects any “no-first-use” stance and even allows pre-emptive strikes if the regime deems it necessary. (A Korea Times analysis calls this “escalatory and destabilising” because it embraces first use.)
This is an eye opener! 👆😮
Official rhetoric stresses deterrence: state media insist the expanding arsenal is needed because of “the US-led bloc’s reckless nuclear threats” and joint war exercises. Kim himself has openly said that US-South Korea drills are “provocations” justifying a “rapid expansion” of North Korea’s nuclear forces. Meanwhile, North Korea proclaims it will not proliferate its nuclear materials to others, and that its weapons serve the goals of state survival, sovereignty and “strategic stability” in the world.

In short, official doctrine is that North Korea’s nuclear force is a deterrent “safeguarding the nation.” Its two declared roles are deterrence and (if needed) “repelling enemy aggression” by possible nuclear counter‑attack. The new law suggests Pyongyang does not rule out a first-use scenario in a conflict, at least as outlined in policy texts.
 
We need to recognize DPRK as a legit nuclear state and lift the sanctions. They got them, and no way we are taking them away without too great of a loss to us and our allies. So, time to lift the sanctions and recognize DPRK as a legitimate nuclear power. Hate to say it, but they won.

The ONLY way to do what I mentioned above is if we give them the means or ROK makes their own nukes too. Then we can pull out of ROK and let the two deal with their differences. Both will be on equal footing then, and M.A.D. will prevent them from waging a war.

It's not something we can just do overnight and pull out overnight. ROK would have to build up its military, including building up a nuclear force, before we could leave them and let them defend themselves and work out their differences themselves with their neighbors.

But in my opinion, that would be the best way to create less tensions and a more peaceful Asia if we recognize North Korea as an official nuclear state and lift the sanctions. At least it would be a good start. But again, so long as ROK and Japan can and do develop their own nukes too.

That's why I believe ROK/Japan should and will create their own nuclear arsenal and beef up their militaries. Of course they'll never be friends with DPRK, but that doesn't mean we have to keep hostile relations either by sanctioning them for something they already have, nukes, and now will always have no matter what.

DPRK is here to stay, and so are their nukes. Think it's time we accept that and try to normalize relations or normalize life around that somewhat, and also withdraw from the area once ROK/Japan have nukes and a sizable military to defend themselves.

I say, why risk accidental nuclear war by maintaining such high hostilities over their nuclear weapons when they are there to stay? They won. It's over. Time to move on with our lives before we blow it up over a hair trigger mistake that isn't necessary anymore to be on hair triggers with them.
I have a tendency to believe in this line of thinking. Make NK an ally not an adversary, similar to what was done in WWII with Stalin.
 
He is proving the USA is no longer a trustworthy friend or ally and the world is starting to realise this.

US to give Australia used 8,000-ton nuclear attack submarines under AUKUS deal​

Australia will receive three operational U.S. Navy nuclear-powered submarines as part of a revised AUKUS agreement, announced at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on May 31, 2026. This change is a major shift in the security pact between Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom.

 
I would have to agree with you.

Conversely, a lot of US allies weren't terribly trustworthy, either.
Still aren’t.
The rules based world order has failed, it failed when China and Russia helped Kim develop Nukes.
Just as it did when the French helped build a heavy water reactor in Israel. Or when probably interest in the US facilitated Mossad in “stealing” nuclear technology from the US.
 
We need to recognize DPRK as a legit nuclear state and lift the sanctions. They got them, and no way we are taking them away without too great of a loss to us and our allies. So, time to lift the sanctions and recognize DPRK as a legitimate nuclear power. Hate to say it, but they won.

The ONLY way to do what I mentioned above is if we give them the means or ROK makes their own nukes too. Then we can pull out of ROK and let the two deal with their differences. Both will be on equal footing then, and M.A.D. will prevent them from waging a war.

It's not something we can just do overnight and pull out overnight. ROK would have to build up its military, including building up a nuclear force, before we could leave them and let them defend themselves and work out their differences themselves with their neighbors.

But in my opinion, that would be the best way to create less tensions and a more peaceful Asia if we recognize North Korea as an official nuclear state and lift the sanctions. At least it would be a good start. But again, so long as ROK and Japan can and do develop their own nukes too.

That's why I believe ROK/Japan should and will create their own nuclear arsenal and beef up their militaries. Of course they'll never be friends with DPRK, but that doesn't mean we have to keep hostile relations either by sanctioning them for something they already have, nukes, and now will always have no matter what.

DPRK is here to stay, and so are their nukes. Think it's time we accept that and try to normalize relations or normalize life around that somewhat, and also withdraw from the area once ROK/Japan have nukes and a sizable military to defend themselves.

I say, why risk accidental nuclear war by maintaining such high hostilities over their nuclear weapons when they are there to stay? They won. It's over. Time to move on with our lives before we blow it up over a hair trigger mistake that isn't necessary anymore to be on hair triggers with them.
And what was Trump attempting when he met with Kim in the DMZ in 2018?

But you’re right the DPRK is here to stay. There are cultural and generational differences between the North and South. Unless the west and east want to finish the Korean War there is no reunification in the cards for the next two generations.
 
Not right now, but economically yes, your beloved president is trying to kill us Canadians economically. The economy is the lifeblood of any war.
No, I think that is your own government killing your economy! Not my beloved POTUS! I'll just leave THIS here! 👇:ROFLMAO:

alberta-regional-flag-canada-KW99M5.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: GBS61
I’m going to break forum rules and decorum here. Delete it, ban me I really don’t care

GBS62 you are so full of shit! Literally you spout nonsensical BS like a clowns twaddle. There is no logic no reasoning with you, your are in fact just a Troll and diminish anywhere your presence is manifest.
What he said 👆:love::ROFLMAO:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom