Radioactive leak threat in Russia as flood heads for Uranium mines
Russia's Urals region and neighboring northern Kazakhstan have suffered the worst flooding in 80 years.
www.newsweek.com
Uranium really isn't that radioactive, the total radiation release would be considerably less than Fukushima or Chernobyl.
I would be surprised if there was an uptick in cancers in a few years.
For context, a Bq or Becquerel is a single decay. e.g. 1 gamma ray or 1 alpha particle.
Natural uranium has a specific activity of ~ 25 Bq/mg or 25*10^3 Bq/g
1 ton = 1*10^6 g
so 7077*10^6 grams
7077*10^6 * 25*10^3 = 1.77*10^14 or 0.177 PBq
For context, the total radiation release at Fukushima was ~ 770 PBq
Compare 770 PBq with 0.177 PBq, so the total release of all the uranium at the mine would be 0.023% of the radiation release at Fukushima, tiny by comparison. It should also be noted that no member of the public was put at increased risk of cancer by the accident at Fukushima.
Also, that 770 PBq is for Beta & Gamma activity, uranium undergoes alpha decay, which can be stopped by skin and only poses a risk if ingested or inhaled.