• Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.

Return of SLCM-N

Status
Not open for further replies.
Publius

Publius

Power Poster IV
Joined
Sep 6, 2022
LOCATION
Fly over country
OReid said:
Continued progress to nuclear cruise missiles for Virginia class submarine

www.twz.com

Pros And Cons Of The Navy's Controversial Submarine-Launched Nuclear Cruise Missile

Will Trump returning to the White House put wind in the sails of the nuclear-tipped cruise missile program he started?
www.twz.com www.twz.com
Click to expand...
Continued yes slow definitely.
Reports suggest US submarines won't be armed with nuclear weapons capabilities for approximately 10 more yrs. This issue suggests the triad claim is incorrect currently and for previous 32 yrs. And even 12months wait for such seems weird considering global western tensions. Alot can happen in hrs,days,weeks,months a year or 2. 10 more yrs for such capabilities may never happen.
Still time will tell. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Source from William in other thread.
 
Last edited:
We (US) have nuclear subs with nuclear ballistic missile on them. For well over 50 years now. Lmao! 😆

The cruise missile is just extra. We already have ample nuclear missile on our many nuclear subs more than cable of flattening Russia, China, and Iran alone.
 
Last edited:
Both of you knock it off and start acting like adults. There is nothing in our terms of service that says you have to like each other, but we have always been crystal clear about being respectful in discussions. I have deleted all the irrelevant content without warnings. Consider that my Thanksgiving gift to both of you.
 
Yingyang said:
Reports suggest US submarines won't be armed with nuclear weapons capabilities for approximately 10 more yrs.
Click to expand...
The United States and the Soviet Union have both had submarines armed with nuclear missiles at sea for over 60 years, followed by the UK, France, China, India, and even North Korea has an experimental model. This is established historical fact, and I am quite frankly astonished that anyone would suggest these submarines and missiles don't exist.
 
RiffRaff said:
The United States and the Soviet Union have both had submarines armed with nuclear missiles at sea for over 60 years, followed by the UK, France, China, India, and even North Korea has an experimental model. This is established historical fact, and I am quite frankly astonished that anyone would suggest these submarines and missiles don't exist.
Click to expand...
Williams report suggests nuclear weapons were removed 32 yrs ago and 10 yrs to replace.
It only mentioned US SUBMARINES. Not sure why you thought i suggested everyone's submarines.
 
RiffRaff said:
The United States and the Soviet Union have both had submarines armed with nuclear missiles at sea for over 60 years, followed by the UK, France, China, India, and even North Korea has an experimental model. This is established historical fact, and I am quite frankly astonished that anyone would suggest these submarines and missiles don't exist.
Click to expand...
#1 William thread. US submarines to re-arm nuclear weapons after 3 decades.
 
Yingyang said:
Williams report suggests nuclear weapons were removed 32 yrs ago and 10 yrs to replace.
It only mentioned US SUBMARINES. Not sure why you thought i suggested everyone's submarines.
Click to expand...
I don't have to read the report to know that this falls under conspiracy theory and is a ludicrous claim.

I listed the other countries because it initially sounded like the claim was that submarine-launched nuclear weapons were never in existence, but I see on re-reading that wasn't part of the initial claim.
 
RiffRaff said:
I don't have to read the report to know that this falls under conspiracy theory and is a ludicrous claim.

I listed the other countries because it initially sounded like the claim was that submarine-launched nuclear weapons were never in existence, but I see on re-reading that wasn't part of the initial claim.
Click to expand...
Maybe talk to William about posting conspiracy theories than. NOT MY DOING.
 
Yingyang said:
Maybe talk to William about posting conspiracy theories than. NOT MY DOING.
Click to expand...
Didn't say it was your doing. I was just addressing the claim in this thread. I never accused *you* of posting conspiracy theory; I just stated that the report was conspiracy theory. If I thought you were propagating it I would have deleted your post as CT.
 
RiffRaff said:
I don't have to read the report to know that this falls under conspiracy theory and is a ludicrous claim.

I listed the other countries because it initially sounded like the claim was that submarine-launched nuclear weapons were never in existence, but I see on re-reading that wasn't part of the initial claim.
Click to expand...
I didn't believe it either did independent search.
Interesting engineering. Com had the same story aswell as another source i don't recall.
 
Yingyang said:
Make up your mind you bitch about it than call it entertaining. Ffs.
Click to expand...
Fine. Thread is locked. I do my best to deescalate and keep things laid back by using humor but people still want to get up in their feelings.

Go post in other threads now, but keep it on topic and any conduct any personal bickering in private messages.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom