• Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.

UA-RU | March 24th-26th | REPORTS

Status
Not open for further replies.

⚠️​

American Carrier Strike Group Forward Deployed and On Standby For Orders to Intervene in Ukraine - Commander:​


United States Navy has deployed a carrier strike group within operational range of Ukraine. A move specifically aimed at providing Washington with options for intervention in Ukraine.
Click to expand...
Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro said its mission included “deterring” Russia and implementing a potential no fly zone over Ukraine should the White House give the order, stressing: “The role of Truman, with other allies, is to deter Russians from further aggression and to be on constant standby for orders that might be given from our president or from other leaders around the world for the protection of Ukraine and the people of Ukraine.”
Click to expand...
The commander added regarding the presence of Russian assets near to the strike group’s area of operations: “There are numerous Russian ships and subs in the Mediterranean today and that’s why it’s important for NATO to have an equal presence, to deter them. The only thing that Putin understands is strength.”
Click to expand...

militarywatchmagazine.com

American Carrier Strike Group Forward Deployed and On Standby For Orders to Intervene in Ukraine - Commander

The United States Navy has deployed a carrier strike group build around the Nimitz Class supercarrier USS Harry Truman to the Mediterranean Sea within operational range
militarywatchmagazine.com militarywatchmagazine.com
 
DarkNoon said:

⚠️​

American Carrier Strike Group Forward Deployed and On Standby For Orders to Intervene in Ukraine - Commander:​






militarywatchmagazine.com

American Carrier Strike Group Forward Deployed and On Standby For Orders to Intervene in Ukraine - Commander

The United States Navy has deployed a carrier strike group build around the Nimitz Class supercarrier USS Harry Truman to the Mediterranean Sea within operational range
militarywatchmagazine.com militarywatchmagazine.com
Click to expand...
It’s not even in the Black Sea, they’re Facebook Page says that they were in Souda Bay 9 hours ago. https://www.airlant.usff.navy.mil/P...-gaulle-conduct-joint-operates-in-ionian-sea/
 
Last edited:
To quell any concerns:

The Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group is located in the Aegean Sea right now with NATO forces. They are not in the Black Sea. Anyone saying otherwise is lying.

They aren't even in battle positions.
 
DarkNoon said:

American Carrier Strike Group Forward Deployed and On Standby For Orders to Intervene in Ukraine - Commander:​

Click to expand...
Okay, I have a problem with this article's headline. There is no quote from the navy commander about possibly implementing a no-fly zone. What Navy Secretary Carlos Del Tor said was, "The role of Truman, with other allies, is to deter Russians from further aggression and to be on constant standby for orders that might be given from our president or from other leaders around the world for the protection of Ukraine and the people of Ukraine." The commander went on to say "There are numerous Russian ships and subs in the Mediterranean today and that’s why it’s important for NATO to have an equal presence, to deter them. The only thing that Putin understands is strength.”

See "no-fly" in there anywhere? Nope.

Those statements could mean anything. Maybe it does mean a no-fly zone. Certainly the fact that he said "protection of Ukraine and the people of Ukraine" concerns the heck out of me.

But no one said anything about a "no-fly" zone. That was the editor editorializing.
 
Empire said:
To quell any concerns:

The Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group is located in the Aegean Sea right now with NATO forces. They are not in the Black Sea. Anyone saying otherwise is lying.

They aren't even in battle positions.
Click to expand...
Didn't think I would get a comfirm or bust on that article so quickly. Thanks for the great work as always from the community!
 
Empire said:
To quell any concerns:

The Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group is located in the Aegean Sea right now with NATO forces. They are not in the Black Sea. Anyone saying otherwise is lying.

They aren't even in battle positions.
Click to expand...
I read it as being deployed, not that they were there right now.
 
DEFCON Warning System said:
Okay, I have a problem with this article's headline. There is no quote from the navy commander about possibly implementing a no-fly zone. What Navy Secretary Carlos Del Tor said was, "The role of Truman, with other allies, is to deter Russians from further aggression and to be on constant standby for orders that might be given from our president or from other leaders around the world for the protection of Ukraine and the people of Ukraine." The commander went on to say "There are numerous Russian ships and subs in the Mediterranean today and that’s why it’s important for NATO to have an equal presence, to deter them. The only thing that Putin understands is strength.”

See "no-fly" in there anywhere? Nope.

Those statements could mean anything. Maybe it does mean a no-fly zone. Certainly the fact that he said "protection of Ukraine and the people of Ukraine" concerns the heck out of me.

But no one said anything about a "no-fly" zone. That was the editor editorializing.
Click to expand...
I’m just confused about where exactly this was said. Did we miss something? Do these people have an inside source or something? I know nothing about them
 
DEFCON Warning System said:
I read it as being deployed, not that they were there right now.
Click to expand...
Radar isn't reflecting any enhanced movements. That's why I said it isn't happening.

For someone to have gotten ahold of a deployment order though, and to have leaked it...... from aboard a NATO/U.S. Warship, or an airborne command post? It's unlikely.
 
DEFCON Warning System said:
I read it as being deployed, not that they were there right now.
Click to expand...
I’m not sure on this but I don’t believe a carrier strike group could even enter the BS. There are treaty limits on how many non-ported naval vessels can be in the black see at any one time.
Lots of news about ships “from” a strike group entering the BS but never the actual carrier.
And what ever admiral or politician who ever orders a USCSG into the BS should be keelhauled
They would be fish in a barrel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom