• Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.

UA-RU | March 27th-29th | DISCUSSIONS

Status
Not open for further replies.
We can’t know the mind of any of these leaders very well.
In many cases some do not even known their own mind. There doesn’t seem to be much agreement from negotiations, some yes, but there are significant sticking points.

Putin has to have significant win, Ukraine demands their nation back and reparations (never happen).

The west is satisfied for now just feeding aid and weapons to Ukraine.
So no one will give and escalation will follow. Or the war will follow with a back and forth of battle lines.

Russia’s armor has been neutered with the NLAW’s. Their airforce especially their ground assault helos are also neutered as well.
This isn’t a condemnation of Russian equipment or even soldiers.
It’s new weapons to confront old tactics.
The US or any NATO nation would be in a fight for their lives against these types of shoulder fired weapons as well.

Russia has missiles and ability to level cities and some troop concentrations.
But Ukrainians army is mostly dispersed and mobile so they are only consistently able to pound on civilian populations.
This wears down Ukrainians but it also Inflames them.
Russian artillery fire doesn’t seem to be coordinated and accurate enough to be brought to bare on Ukrainian forces so they are left to grind civilian and infrastructure as well.

Ukraine does not have the armor or arty to pound the Russian lines and break them in an attack.
They can drone convoys and disrupt them but they can’t saturation bomb Russian forces in a way that causes a total collapse of a line.

So this will turn in to a WW1 type war with infantry battles of strike and counter strike.

With out trained coordinated arty and air to ground attacks the war now will simply grind on.

NATO could use conventional forces to smash Russian military concentrations and the Russians could be driven back rather quickly.
But of course how will this be responded to, that’s what everybody’s worried about now.

I see it happening eventually though, nato will get more involved. Targeted cruise missile attacks, reapers with hellfire missiles. But how soon I don’t know.

Russia is in a bind it’s going to a bloody and unpopular war for them and unless the Ukraine people’s spirit just collapses. Russia will come away with very little gains compared to the cost. A wrecked economy and depleted and demoralized military.

NATO has to walk a very fine line as well. How long can they supply aid but not engage with their forces. While reports of Ukrainian cities being leveled continue to roll in and refugees flee to the west. (ever notice that refugees always flow to the west) we’re such pricks.

Should coulda kept the aid flowing to them in the first part of 2021 and brought them in to NATO before the invasion.
Wars are as much about determination of will and the balls to show it as military strength.
The Ukrainians have proved that but will they be willing or able to suffer the generational loses that the Vietnamese did?

Now we are fighting a war by proxy and by “default” treating Ukraine like a nato nation without sharing any of the direct risk or losses. The longer that continues the little moral authority that nato has will dissipate.

Tough choices ahead.
 
Mmmm I don't think so. Though Reagan did say a lot of wild things back in the day. If any president said anything similar to what Biden said today it would of been Reagan or possibly Nixon could have too another wild president.
They didn’t they condemned their system. And everyone was convinced then we were going to burn up in Armageddon as well.
But it worked out rather well in the end
 
Well twitters all a flutter over his speech and demanding Putin be removed. It was grander that Reagan’s speech at the Brandenburg memorial you would have thought.
 
I’d like to believe it was a gaff, or an emotional thing. We all know what he’s like.
But I doubt the Kremlin will see it this way.
I agree. POTUS: "For God's sake, this man cannot remain in power."
Fill in the blank with any other world leaders and it would be a direct threat.
It doesn't matter how the leader's handlers spin it later.

"If this were President of Russia: 'For God's sake, President Biden cannot remain in power.'," then you would see the Western media screaming 24x7, "Putin declares war on USA." And we all know that is true.

It is one thing for former USA POTUS Trump to threaten tiny North Korea dictator.

It is totally different for USA POTUS to threaten the Russian President - no matter who it is.
Deserved or not deserved. Right or wrong. It is still totally different.
And we can tell ourselves that the Russian people won't view it as a threat, but that would be denial.
And if we are honest with ourselves, and willing to assess this outside of our own emotional positions, we would honestly view this as an escalation, which would raise the real DEFCON.

Here is Reuters full report for future reference:

Biden says Putin 'cannot remain in power' in fiery speech on Ukraine war

March 26, 2022
5:02 PM EDT

WARSAW, March 26 (Reuters) - U.S. President Joe Biden said that Russia's leader Vladimir Putin "cannot remain in power" in Poland Saturday, remarks a White House official said later were meant to prepare the world's democracies for extended conflict over Ukraine, not back regime change in Russia.

Biden's comments on Saturday, including a statement earlier in the day calling Putin a "butcher," were a sharp escalation of the U.S. approach to Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine.

In a major address delivered at Warsaw's Royal Castle, Biden evoked Poland's four decades behind the Iron Curtain in an effort to build a case that the world's democracies must urgently confront an autocratic Russia as a threat to global security and freedom.

But a remark at the end of the speech raised the spectre of an escalation by Washington, which has avoided direct military involvement in Ukraine, and has specifically said it does not back regime change.

"For God's sake, this man cannot remain in power," Biden told a crowd in Warsaw after condemning Putin's month-long war in Ukraine.

A White House official said Biden's remarks did not represent a shift in Washington's policy.

"The President's point was that Putin cannot be allowed to exercise power over his neighbours or the region," the official said. "He was not discussing Putin's power in Russia, or regime change."

The speech came after three days of meetings in Europe with the G7, European Council and NATO allies, and took place roughly at the same time as rockets rained down on the western Ukrainian city of Lviv, just 60 kilometres (40 miles) from the Polish border.

"Their brave resistance is part of a larger fight for essential democratic principles that unite all free people," Biden said. "We stand with you. Period."

In his speech, Biden said NATO is a defensive security alliance which never sought Russia's demise and he reiterated that the West has no desire to harm Russia's people even as its sanctions threaten to cripple their economy.

Poland was under communist rule for four decades until 1989 and was a member of the Moscow-led Warsaw Pact security alliance. It is now part of the European Union and NATO.

The rise of right-wing populism in Poland in recent years has put it in conflict with the EU and Washington, but fears of Russia pressing beyond its borders has drawn Poland closer to its Western allies.

Speaking to a crowd holding U.S., Polish and Ukrainian flags, Biden said the West is acting in unison because of the "gravity of the threat" to global peace.

"The battle for democracy could not conclude and did not conclude with the end of the Cold War," Biden said. "Over the last 30 years the forces of autocracy have revived all across the globe."

Earlier in the day, Biden dropped in on a meeting with Ukraine's foreign and defense ministers and made additional, unspecified security pledges on developing defence cooperation, according to Ukraine's foreign minister, Dmytro Kuleba.

In Warsaw, Biden also visited a refugee reception centre at the national stadium. More than 2 million people have fled the war to Poland. Altogether, about 3.8 million have left Ukraine since fighting began.

Putin calls Russia's military actions in Ukraine a "special military operation" to demilitarise and "denazify" the country
 
Biden is fanning the flames. He said it and meant it. Like DEFCON director said in the last thread, the White House can not spin what he just said. Lines are being drawn. Things may enter a new phase in the coming days.
Biden is definitely going out of his way to get Putin to step over the line but frankly I don’t give a shit anymore. I am done playing nice with these thugs and criminals. 20 plus years of appeasement got us here.
 
Well twitters all a flutter over his speech and demanding Putin be removed. It was grander that Reagan’s speech at the Brandenburg memorial you would have thought.
POTUS may have meant well, but it was reckless and an escalation during a very dangerous world situation.
In my own mind, this would us beyond DEFCON 3 to DEFCON 2.

President John F. Kennedy during Cuban Missile Crisis: Was this not the most direct and specific threat by USA to the USSR and/or Russia? And still President Kennedy did not call for the "removal" of Khrushchev. Or do historians know of any other more aggressive speeches by a POTUS?

October 22, 1962
 
Biden is definitely going out of his way to get Putin to step over the line but frankly I don’t give a shit anymore. I am done playing nice with these thugs and criminals. 20 plus years of appeasement got us here.
OK - then let's stop assuming we are at DEFCON 3.
There ain't no such thing as a free lunch - in life or in security.
 
There's no way to assess whether Biden's speech was a mistake. Nobody has access to what intelligence knows.

It seems wrong to treat Putin like you treat Kim Jong Un. Logic says yes. But we don't know what's going on.

Putin may have decided to make a major chemical attack.
Putin may have decided to attack or invade a NATO member.
Putin may have decided to use a tactical nuclear weapon.
Someone could be plotting a coup and needed a clear signal that they will have support to try and the West supports it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zank
Now we know why they won’t “let” Biden visit Ukraine. He’s incapable of leaving emotion out of a highly volatile situation, clearly has cognitive decline, and may be compromised. When he goes off script, he could cause a nuclear war. It’s seeming more and more likely every day that he is not actually in control of anything, and someone is in control of HIM.

These are dangerous times we are living in right now. I wasn’t as concerned last week. Now i’m getting worried.
 
Biden has dementia but Putin is acting like an irrational psychopath at this moment which is alot of worse.
Yes Putin has decided to invade Ukraine, and he has decided to bomb civs in Ukraine and is using chemical weapons white phosphorous at this moment.
White phosphorus releases a toxic gas when burned in the air.
what-are-the-white-phosphorus-bombs-these-weapons-that-the.jpeg

It will burn through the roofs and the smoke released inside the houses
can cause asphyxiation and permanent respiratory damage.


Moderator Edit: Corrected disinformation posted
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biden has dementia but Putin is acting like an irrational psychopath at this moment which is alot of worse.
Yes Putin has decided to invade Ukraine, and he has decided to bomb civs in Ukraine and is using chemical weapons at this moment.
White phosphorus releases a toxic gas when burned in the air.
what-are-the-white-phosphorus-bombs-these-weapons-that-the.jpeg

It will burn through the roofs and the smoke released inside the houses
can cause asphyxiation and permanent respiratory damage.

WP weapons are not considered "Chemical Weapons," despite your lame attempt to brand them that way.

You're on a very short leash. Don't come in here stirring things up with your crap.
 
The only improvised moment was when Biden said that Putin was a butcher. He had just spoken with refugees and was asked by a reporter.
 
Biden has dementia but Putin is acting like an irrational psychopath at this moment which is alot of worse.
Yes Putin has decided to invade Ukraine, and he has decided to bomb civs in Ukraine and is using chemical weapons at this moment.
White phosphorus releases a toxic gas when burned in the air.
what-are-the-white-phosphorus-bombs-these-weapons-that-the.jpeg

It will burn through the roofs and the smoke released inside the houses
can cause asphyxiation and permanent respiratory damage.

Please stop with Biden has dementia unless you can provide specific diagnosis from a doctor. Everybody his age is not going to have that “spark” we look for in a President but that doesn’t mean he automatically is sick. He has meant everything he has said and IMO it needs to be said and is years overdue. He is not letting emotions affect his decisions or else we would already have our troops in Ukraine. He is however trying to get Putin to make more dumb decisions based off his emotions. NATO is calling the shots right now anyways.
 
I think the whole "Biden said x" situation is totally being blown out of proportion. How many nuclear escalations has Russian threatened to date, how many nuclear threats have Russian lawmakers and politicians levelled at Warsaw and or Nato. How many red lines has Russia released at Nato that have already been crossed besides the actual you know " no american boots on the ground in ukraine", clause. The US is responsible for quite a bit of Russias problems with all the field weaponry and intel we are providing to Ukraine, it's no secret. (Besides volunteers and mercs clearly not from Ukraine). Biden doesn't have to say a thing and we would still be a buttons hairline from a surprise nuclear attack from weeks ago to present. Anyone who has followed US politics realized the moment Biden took office he never was and will never be in control of anything besides reading the prepared teleprompter from his handlers. The man is totally inept and in a constant state of brain fog. His sole purpose was to fill the vacancy that Trump left after he was purged for not following the deep state script. I can't understand how Nato wouldn't be prepared for a nuclear response as honestly anyone with half a brain can see it coming a mile away. So in short, whatever Biden said are still words and not worse than the rhetoric coming out of the Kremlin and their existential crisis bullshit. If they want to exchange then let them do it already, I don't think hiding our heads in the sand will make Putin just go away.
 
I think the whole "Biden said x" situation is totally being blown out of proportion. How many nuclear escalations has Russian threatened to date, how many nuclear threats have Russian lawmakers and politicians levelled at Warsaw and or Nato. How many red lines has Russia released at Nato that have already been crossed besides the actual you know " no american boots on the ground in ukraine", clause. The US is responsible for quite a bit of Russias problems with all the field weaponry and intel we are providing to Ukraine, it's no secret. (Besides volunteers and mercs clearly not from Ukraine). Biden doesn't have to say a thing and we would still be a buttons hairline from a surprise nuclear attack from weeks ago to present. Anyone who has followed US politics realized the moment Biden took office he never was and will never be in control of anything besides reading the prepared teleprompter from his handlers. The man is totally inept and in a constant state of brain fog. His sole purpose was to fill the vacancy that Trump left after he was purged for not following the deep state script. I can't understand how Nato wouldn't be prepared for a nuclear response as honestly anyone with half a brain can see it coming a mile away. So in short, whatever Biden said are still words and not worse than the rhetoric coming out of the Kremlin and their existential crisis bullshit. If they want to exchange then let them do it already, I don't think hiding our heads in the sand will make Putin just go away.
I understand the point of view, but I disagree. POTUS JFK also threatened to use nuclear weapons in October 1962: " It shall be the policy of this Nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the Western Hemisphere as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union. "

But POTUS JFK did not threaten USSR's Chairman Khrushchev directly or indirectly as to his person, by calling for his "removal." I understand (and of course share) the view of the heinous commands of Russia's president Putin, but there is also no doubt that there is a Russian chain of command exercising those commands. If Putin were to directly call for the removal of POTUS Biden, all of the mainstream media and commenters would consider it a direct threat and an act of war. IMO, this changes a DEFCON status in USA. USA leaderships continues to count on patience and restraint by a Russia willing to use tanks and missiles on Ukraine and its civilians. USA leadership of assessment of that restraint in Russia leadership is not based on reality. There are many other ways that WWIII can be fought other than thermonuclear weapons.
 
I understand the point of view, but I disagree. POTUS JFK also threatened to use nuclear weapons in October 1962: " It shall be the policy of this Nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the Western Hemisphere as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union. "

But POTUS JFK did not threaten USSR's Chairman Khrushchev directly or indirectly as to his person, by calling for his "removal." I understand (and of course share) the view of the heinous commands of Russia's president Putin, but there is also no doubt that there is a Russian chain of command exercising those commands. If Putin were to directly call for the removal of POTUS Biden, all of the mainstream media and commenters would consider it a direct threat and an act of war. IMO, this changes a DEFCON status in USA. USA leaderships continues to count on patience and restraint by a Russia willing to use tanks and missiles on Ukraine and its civilians. USA leadership of assessment of that restraint in Russia leadership is not based on reality. There are many other ways that WWIII can be fought other than thermonuclear weapons.
The big difference is Biden will probably not win a second term anyways and he knows it. While Putin will remain in power till?
 
Perhaps many of the 'grey' countries have been historically shafted by Europe/America, have been exploited, have their own wars/internal struggles going on, & perhaps they don't believe that the western alliances really have their back, so why sanction Russia and make their own situations more difficult? I for one am not surprised.
Feel free to move post to appropriate thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom