And what I have to say about that? I have reported what Vyacheslav Volodin has probabily said and I have recognized that the Cremlin response is soft. If the the President of State Duma has said that, don't we have to report the fact? However, if you are so sure that nothing will happen, then someone can continue to make other similar attacks without risk. Or maybe a drone exploding on Cremlin residence of rhe Russian President is something with an "importance"...
What Volodin says it's not a fact...is propaganda...Volodin every 2/3 months as soon as there's an occasion he comes out with random threats of, global catastrophe, nuclear war, blah blah.
There's only a person that really counts ATM in Russia...Putin.
So what matters is what Putin, Lavrov and Peskov say.
You keep saying that this was an attack...to be an attack, you need two things: an attacker and someone who takes the takes the merit of the attack.
Both are missing.
And anyway...why would Ukraine attack the Kremlin, knowing that Putin is not even there? What would they gain?
If you're so sure that something big will happen, why don't you make an example?
What could happen worse than what's currently already happening? A nuclear attack? A chemical attack? Bombing Zelensky's home?
Does any of these responses make any sense? And would have Russia something to gain from something like that?
Also...do you realize that Ukraine has performed several attacks on Belgorod's region during the past months?
The fact "that someone will continue to make other similar attacks without risk", mostly does not apply in wars....there's a reason if Ukraine is not attacking Moscow, and SP which are pretty close.
No reason to try to kill Putin, knowing that he wasn't even there.
If you wanna wear the thin helmet for this drone's story...go ahead...
