• Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.

Kremlin Drone Attack & Putin Assassination Attempt | 05-03-2023

Status
Not open for further replies.
Russia is saying this shit from the beginning of the "special operation".
Their propaganda keeps talking about "unleashing" their whole arsenal...bombing Berlin, sinking the UK to the bottom of the sea, since Feb 2022
This is not an escalation...do you think that government places in Kiev have never been targeted until today?
Kiev has already denied their involvement.
Russia does have a strong latent opposition which is heating up among the people...so this probably comes from the inside.

They will never declare war to Kiev for a drone which exploded doing nothing above the Kremlin for 2 reasons...there's no support for it, and also because they keep referring to ukranians as terrorists...and not enemies.
It was a terrorist attack...not a military action.
The wording is very important because no one in Russia would approve an official full fledged war against their own brothers.

The media trying to say....Russia is using this to justify further attacks...it's just being ridiculous as always.
What would Russia do? Mass bomb the cities? That's already happening.
Try to blow up Zelensky's home? For what?

Could be just a pretext to justify an increase of the population called at arms.
 
Russia is saying this shit from the beginning of the "special operation".
Their propaganda keeps talking about "unleashing" their whole arsenal...bombing Berlin, sinking the UK to the bottom of the sea, since Feb 2022
This is not an escalation...do you think that government places in Kiev have never been targeted until today?
Kiev has already denied their involvement.
Russia does have a strong latent opposition which is heating up among the people...so this probably comes from the inside.

They will never declare war to Kiev for a drone which exploded doing nothing above the Kremlin for 2 reasons...there's no support for it, and also because they keep referring to ukranians as terrorists...and not enemies.
It was a terrorist attack...not a military action.
The working is very important because no one in Russia would approve an official full fledged war against their own brothers.

The media trying to say....Russia is using this to justify further attacks...it's just being ridiculous as always.
What would Russia do? Mass bomb the cities? That's already happening.
Try to blow up Zelensky's home? For what?

Could be just a pretext to justify an increase of the population called at arms.

And what I have to say about that? I have reported what Vyacheslav Volodin has probabily said and I have recognized that the Cremlin response is soft. If the the President of State Duma has said that, don't we have to report the fact? However, if you are so sure that nothing will happen, then someone can continue to make other similar attacks without risk. Or maybe a drone exploding on Cremlin residence of rhe Russian President is something with an "importance"...
 
Personally, I don't think. If it was a false flag operation, it would mean that Russians want to have a pretext to do something. But if they want to do something, why their response is soft?

However, I have just read (but I don't find confirmations), that the President of the State Duma Vyacheslav Volodin has declared that an attack to the President is an attack to Russia and he will ask the use of any kind of weapon usefull to destroy Kiev gouvenement.
🥱 my guess its Russian dissidents or faction within Russia against Putin. All the dozens of sabotage incidents in Russia can't all be Ukraine. Clearly a movement by russian citizens in the shadows defying Putins genocidal dictatorship.
 
LOL Russia already in a "full fledged" invasion of Ukraine. 🤦‍♂️

this answer make absolutely no sense at all. An uterine response, as usual. I tell you with simple words. The Russian invasion of Ukraine is actually a full fledged cause to declare war, ok? A drone hitting the Cremlin is a full fledged cause to declare war too. So, it depends on what Russia will do about that. We don't know what, but this is an heavy excalating move. Undestood? Instead to put here and there silly faces... try to go beyond concepts that can stay in a t-shirt.
 
And what I have to say about that? I have reported what Vyacheslav Volodin has probabily said and I have recognized that the Cremlin response is soft. If the the President of State Duma has said that, don't we have to report the fact? However, if you are so sure that nothing will happen, then someone can continue to make other similar attacks without risk. Or maybe a drone exploding on Cremlin residence of rhe Russian President is something with an "importance"...
What Volodin says it's not a fact...is propaganda...Volodin every 2/3 months as soon as there's an occasion he comes out with random threats of, global catastrophe, nuclear war, blah blah.
There's only a person that really counts ATM in Russia...Putin.
So what matters is what Putin, Lavrov and Peskov say.

You keep saying that this was an attack...to be an attack, you need two things: an attacker and someone who takes the takes the merit of the attack.
Both are missing.
And anyway...why would Ukraine attack the Kremlin, knowing that Putin is not even there? What would they gain?

If you're so sure that something big will happen, why don't you make an example?
What could happen worse than what's currently already happening? A nuclear attack? A chemical attack? Bombing Zelensky's home?
Does any of these responses make any sense? And would have Russia something to gain from something like that?

Also...do you realize that Ukraine has performed several attacks on Belgorod's region during the past months?
The fact "that someone will continue to make other similar attacks without risk", mostly does not apply in wars....there's a reason if Ukraine is not attacking Moscow, and SP which are pretty close.
No reason to try to kill Putin, knowing that he wasn't even there.

If you wanna wear the thin helmet for this drone's story...go ahead...:D
 
I mean I would really, really, really love to believe Ukraine did it because they should be targeting the Kremlin *🇷🇺.

But I don't see it that way logically. To much doubt to say definitively either way, weather it was Russian dissident or Ukraine. No one can say with certainty.

But definitely leaning towards Russian dissidents did this. If one sits back and takes a look at the wider picture with all the DOZENS of recent sabotage attacks deep within Russia, one would logically come to the conclusion it was Russian dissidents.
 
I mean I would really, really, really love to believe Ukraine did it because they should be targeting the Kremlin *🇷🇺.

But I don't see it that way logically. To much doubt to say definitively either way, weather it was Russian dissident or Ukraine. No one can say with certainty.

But definitely leaning towards Russian dissidents did this. If one sits back and takes a look at the wider picture with all the DOZENS of recent sabotage attacks deep within Russia, one would logically come to the conclusion it was Russian dissidents.
Not only that but IF Ukraine did this, I don't think the West would like Ukraine doing this. I do think it's either a false flag or Russian resistance groups.
 
If I had ot bet money, I'd go for an attack by the opposition. Doesn't matter, though. Publicly, Russia is blaming Ukraine. Even if the higher-ups knew it wasn't Ukraine, Russia is going to respond as if it was Ukraine. They have to. Othewise the public will see a lack of response to an attack on Moscow.

So truth, attack by dissidents, or outright lie, it's going to fall on Ukraine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom