• Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.

Continuous Drone Sightings Above Military Bases Over Northern US Has Military & Public Officials Buzzing

Americas most advanced anti-drone technology fails . Andurial best technology the fury has no affect on current drone activities being undertaken currently.
In my opinion China is most likely behind this as they are the best drone producers globally.
Who ever it is has definitely used technology the west has no idea about. No signature detected, no abilities to disable them and no frequency recognition. Lights seen may not be lights but irs instead.
 
Yingyang said:
Americas most advanced anti-drone technology fails . Andurial best technology the fury has no affect on current drone activities being undertaken currently.
In my opinion China is most likely behind this as they are the best drone producers globally.
Who ever it is has definitely used technology the west has no idea about. No signature detected, no abilities to disable them and no frequency recognition. Lights seen may not be lights but irs instead.
Click to expand...
Can't shoot drones down over populated areas nincompoop.

ALSO most Importantly it is illegal for US military to take/make ANY action within US States because of this thing called the constitution which strictly prohibits military being used within the country and would need Congress approval to authorize military force inside the US or martial law. President or ANY military officials cannot alone authorize such actions inside US homeland without Congress. "Red tape" a bitch & holds everything back.

But let's just jump right into the most bias anti west thoughts and baselessly with no facts ripping western military. Typical, played out, boring repeated content. Next?
 
Last edited:
DarkNoon said:
Can't shoot drones down over populated areas nincompoop.

ALSO most Importantly it is illegal for US military to take/make ANY action within US States because of this thing called the constitution which strictly prohibits military being used within the country and would need Congress approval to authorize military force inside the US or martial law. President or ANY military officials cannot alone authorize such actions inside US homeland without Congress. "Red tape" a bitch & holds everything back.

But let's just jump right into the most bias anti west thoughts and baselessly with no facts ripping western military. Typical, played out, boring repeated 💩 content. Next?
Click to expand...
I was on the road today and this occurred to me also.
 
DarkNoon said:
Can't shoot drones down over populated areas nincompoop.

ALSO most Importantly it is illegal for US military to take/make ANY action within US States because of this thing called the constitution which strictly prohibits military being used within the country and would need Congress approval to authorize military force inside the US or martial law. President or ANY military officials cannot alone authorize such actions inside US homeland without Congress. "Red tape" a bitch & holds everything back.

But let's just jump right into the most bias anti west thoughts and baselessly with no facts ripping western military. Typical, played out, boring repeated 💩 content. Next?
Click to expand...
Study more. I never mentioned ammunition being used to take it down. Nor did I mention US MILITARY. Grab another box of tissues. Post wasn't anti-west either you are so so over sensational and sensitive. Enjoy yourself maybe that is your relief. No I didn't say release. Relief. 😉
 
DarkNoon said:
Can't shoot drones down over populated areas nincompoop.

ALSO most Importantly it is illegal for US military to take/make ANY action within US States because of this thing called the constitution which strictly prohibits military being used within the country and would need Congress approval to authorize military force inside the US or martial law. President or ANY military officials cannot alone authorize such actions inside US homeland without Congress. "Red tape" a bitch & holds everything back.

But let's just jump right into the most bias anti west thoughts and baselessly with no facts ripping western military. Typical, played out, boring repeated 💩 content. Next?
Click to expand...
Red tape sorted for balloons. Yes shot down.
This situation obviously different which is why I stated disability of drones not possible through technology not ammunition. 🤡🤣😂🤣
 
Yingyang said:
Americas most advanced anti-drone technology fails . Andurial best technology the fury has no affect on current drone activities being undertaken currently.
In my opinion China is most likely behind this as they are the best drone producers globally.
Who ever it is has definitely used technology the west has no idea about. No signature detected, no abilities to disable them and no frequency recognition. Lights seen may not be lights but irs instead.
Click to expand...
I’m not sure the Fury is even out of development and testing yet.
Do you have a source indicating it’s been deployed?

This article is from 11/17/24
theaviationist.com

As General Atomics, Anduril Wingmen Drones Clear USAF Critical Design Review, Let's Look at how Modern Wars are Informing the CCA Program

Air Force Materiel Command’s Col. Timothy M. Helfrich broke down what might constitute the Increment 1 and Increment 2 of the CCAs, describing how the
theaviationist.com theaviationist.com
 
william said:
Strange orbs following aircraft date back to WWII. They were called Foo Fighters by the air crews. There is even a modern rock band named after them.
Click to expand...
You are correct! They go way farther back than WWII. They have no fear and they come and go as they please and there is absolutely nothing that anyone can do about it. Very frustrating for the security troops.
 
Here's the latest that I've discovered not sure yet of it's validity.
Drones are the military looking for one are more of the 80 missing Ukraine warheads unaccounted for from the USSR collapse. Radiation levels in NJ/NY (upper east area) have escalated recently. Drones are searching area for the source. Check Benny Johnson for sources.
 
DarkNoon said:
Can't shoot drones down over populated areas nincompoop.

ALSO most Importantly it is illegal for US military to take/make ANY action within US States because of this thing called the constitution which strictly prohibits military being used within the country and would need Congress approval to authorize military force inside the US or martial law. President or ANY military officials cannot alone authorize such actions inside US homeland without Congress. "Red tape" a bitch & holds everything back.

But let's just jump right into the most bias anti west thoughts and baselessly with no facts ripping western military. Typical, played out, boring repeated 💩 content. Next?
Click to expand...
 
If no one is claiming ownership of these drones why can't they be shot down. No one willing to take ownership so no one to place charges. Just sayin'
 
OReid said:
I was on the road today and this occurred to me also.
Click to expand...
Electronic warfare is failure to disable the drones was my point not bullets not missiles not stupidity. The frequency being used with these drones hasn't been detected as yet. The ability to interfere with them electronically . Shit they still claim they cannot track them either. So the technology being used is clearly beyond American and English capabilities to intercept and even track down for origin. Now in saying that doesn't mean this post is anti-west as some struggling emotionally may perceive. It just points to facts until it isn't.
 
OReid said:
I was on the road today and this occurred to me also.
Click to expand...
Yes. Only if they pose a physical or material threat to the general population or military can the US military take any actions legal within the US. These drones pose no physical or material threat to peoples lives or even property. So no, US military cannot be used here to shoot them down. Not to mention if these drones are from US civilians, that a whole nother' can of worms no one wants to touch with a 10000 foot poll.

Also as someone (not you @OReid ) was unknowingly babbling about here... is that even if US doesn't use missiles any kind of electronic warfare shit would be under the US military control still making it illegal even if missiles where not used to shoot them down. FFS. Also again, populated areas further complicate matters.
 
You are thinking of posse comitatus. Your statement is only mostly true. There are a few dim bulbs that have illegally forced their way onto Air Force Bases and are currently in a box six feet under. I myself have taken idiots into custody for climbing over a chain-link fence at an international airport trying to enter an active flightline.

It just so happens that part of that airport was an Air Force base.

When a military aircraft crashes within the continental US (CONUS) who do you think responds and secures the area?

Who do you think responds to Broken Arrow incidents?

Active duty federal Army, Air Force, Marines, and Navy EOD units respond to incidents on US soil all the time. They do other missions as well.
 
WSSF said:
It just so happens that part of that airport was an Air Force base.

When a military aircraft crashes within the continental US (CONUS) who do you think responds and secures the area?

Who do you think responds to Broken Arrow incidents?

Active duty federal Army, Air Force, Marines, and Navy EOD units respond to incidents on US soil all the time. They do other missions as well.
Click to expand...
That's all great and stuff in first thoughts. But... what happens when they take military action and it was a US civilian. US military being used against a US citizen property within the continental US???

No one going to shoot them down with the military for that reason right there. ☝️
 
DarkNoon said:
That's all great and stuff in first thoughts. But... what happens when they take military action and it was a US civilian. US military being used against a US citizen property within the continental US???

No one going to shoot them down with the military for that reason right there. ☝️
Click to expand...
That is UNTIL they know without a shred of doubt who owns the drones first.
 
Robertjones01@ said:
If no one is claiming ownership of these drones why can't they be shot down. No one willing to take ownership so no one to place charges. Just sayin'
Click to expand...
Population density. Dangerous.
But they cannot even be electronically-frequency interfered with to bring them down safely. I think possibly american and America is being lied too by their own. Probably nothing new there. Or Chinese and the west doesn't have the technology to stop them. Though the more I learn about America the more I'm inclined to believe the drones are American and answers for the population falls in the category as most governments globally. Would not be in the slightest surprised. 😉🤣😂🤣
 
DarkNoon said:
That's all great and stuff in first thoughts. But... what happens when they take military action and it was a US civilian. US military being used against a US citizen property within the continental US???
Click to expand...

DarkNoon said:
No one going to shoot them down with the military for that reason right there. ☝️
Click to expand...
Good question. The incident that I provided was a civilian, you just have to turn them over to either civil authorities or the FBI. There have been times in the past when Fighter aircraft other than the Air National Guard have responded to threats in CONUS.

Normally, any CONUS military action is carried out by either the Air National Guard or Army National Guard, which are under the direct command of a state Governor. So, the protection of our country's air space is the responsibility of the Air National Guard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom