Actually it shows leverage to both sides, if Ukraine doesn’t negotiate they lose aid if Russia doesn’t negotiate Ukraine gets weapons on a scale Russia couldn’t dream of.
It shows Putins empty false threats has entirely manipulated Trump in to doing Putins bidding entirely.
Trump has shown that he gives ZERO FUCKS about whether or not Putin wants peace. If Russia doesn't negotiate he will still abandon Ukraine, the die is cast my friend, this isn't some masterclass in diplomacy. This is the diplomatic fail of the 21st century.
He might as well show us the secret protocols now.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
This story has been disproven. There’s literally zero reason the British would deliver missiles by cargo ship.Russian Missiles Strike Cargo Ship in Odesa Carrying UK Weapons Deliveries and Ukrainian Training Camp in Dnipro – 150 Troops, 30 ‘Foreign Instructors’ Killed * The Gateway Pundit * by Paul Serran
Recent Russian missile strikes have targeted a Ukrainian training facility and a cargo ship linked to UK military support. This escalation highlights the…
proof?
Please explain how Ukraine, a non NATO member, losing leads to Putin invading NATO member states one of which you named he doesn’t even border. Will Putin invade Ukraine again? Maybe depending on what kind of security guarantees Ukraine gets out of the west. Will he invade Moldova? Maybe depending on what Romania is willing to do for them. But ask yourself one simple question, if Putin is plotting to attack NATO, then why do so many officials say the only way for Ukraine to have peace is for them to join NATO?He might as well show us the secret protocols now.
We're running down the clock to WW3. The Baltics and Poland are next - triggering a continental war, which is all but certain to go nuclear. And Russian government figures have repeatedly warned that the US cannot hope to just "sit out" a nuclear war in Europe (translation: we will nuke you too while we're at it).
Here’s the cargo ship they claimed to have bombed. It was carrying soy it’s a lot easier for the Russians to say they bombed a ship with weapons then to tell the truth they bombed a ship carrying food.
Because they don’t have one. I’ve asked it many times myself and it’s always let’s support Ukraine till the end. That’s about as good as thoughts and prayers in response to a mass shooting. Either send weapons and let Ukraine win this thing or negotiate. They’ve had 3 years to send weapons and held back every step of the way, they’ve had 11 years since Crimea to build up their militaries in Europe and haven’t, they continued to buy Russian oil after Trump said it was a bad idea. All they have are words and no actions. So either stop the losses while Ukraine still has a country and can say they didn’t lose or continue the status quo of big talk and no action and see how well that works out.
that make no sense since there is 10 posting about a ship suppling ukraine sunk and one with food going to ukraine.
Why the hell would you send weapons on a ship through Turkey when you could drive them across the polish border? The only sources claiming it was weapons are Russian of which they have provided you zero pictures you can track the ship online from where it left and where it is.
You know what I mean
. Russia wouldn’t be able to stage 150,000 troops in Kaliningrad.
Belarus.You know what I mean
They wouldn't invade from Kalingrad. They have turned that shit into a air defense fortress. They just have to hold it long enough for Troops from Belarus and the capitulated Baltic states to connect the Suwalki Gap. Kalingrad is like their knife pointed towards Europe with missiles.You know what I mean
