- Joined
- Aug 11, 2010
- defconwarningsystem
- DEFCONWSALERTS
- YOUTUBE
- DefconWarningSystem
No one. There isn't a single communist dictatorship in the world. Never has been one.Guess who else is a communist dictatorship?
No one. There isn't a single communist dictatorship in the world. Never has been one.Guess who else is a communist dictatorship?
Communism on the surface is the supposed collective ownership of major economic industries. Collective ownership of anything on a moderate timeline is a joke. Given enough time there will always be individual or small groups who garner enough power to unilaterally control everythingNo one. There isn't a single communist dictatorship in the world. Never has been one.
Mostly the same. Though China isn't gobbling up countries to act as a shield for themselves.Could you consider China as the modern USSR of sorts? Same style of government, same "challenging" the U.S.
While not an inherent invasion Tibet does come to mind.Mostly the same. Though China isn't gobbling up countries to act as a shield for themselves.
That's not as a shield. That's China claiming Tibet was always their land.While not an inherent invasion Tibet does come to mind.
I mean isn’t that what Russia is doing as well?That's not as a shield. That's China claiming Tibet was always their land.
Not really. That's just Russia just trying to justify. They want Ukraine as a shield against NATO.I mean isn’t that what Russia is doing as well?
Duh, that's just No True Scotsman again. Of course there have been communist dictatorships. Plenty of them.No one. There isn't a single communist dictatorship in the world. Never has been one.
Look up "first island chain" and "second island chain".Mostly the same. Though China isn't gobbling up countries to act as a shield for themselves.
No, you are just plain wrong.Not really. That's just Russia just trying to justify. They want Ukraine as a shield against NATO.
/rolls eyesDuh, that's just No True Scotsman again.
Name them.Of course there have been communist dictatorships. Plenty of them.
He's using that as an excuse. The whole intention of grabbing Ukraine is as a buffer between NATO and Russia. That was the whole purpose of the Soviet Union.Putin is on record for declaring multiple times that the Russians and the Ukrainians are "one people" and that the division is an artificial one, and shouldn't exist.
Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin, China under Mao Zedong, North Korea under Kim Il-sung, Cuba under Fidel Castro, Albania under Enver Hoxha, Cambodia under Pol Pot, Vietnam under Ho Chi Minh... do I need to go on? What's the point of this childish exercise?Name them.
This is preposterous. The Soviet Union was making active preparations to invade and conquer the rest of Europe, thus establishing Moscow as a continental hegemon, the same way the US enjoys hegemony in North America.He's using that as an excuse. The whole intention of grabbing Ukraine is as a buffer between NATO and Russia. That was the whole purpose of the Soviet Union.
This is true, but his justification to the Russian people is that the ukranians and Russians are one people so technically it’s Russian land. So you’re correct in what he is trying to do I’m just explaining the means he is justifying it to his population as.He's using that as an excuse. The whole intention of grabbing Ukraine is as a buffer between NATO and Russia. That was the whole purpose of the Soviet Union.
None of those examples were communist. They were socialist dictatorships. You don't seem to know what a communist system is.Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin, China under Mao Zedong, North Korea under Kim Il-sung, Cuba under Fidel Castro, Albania under Enver Hoxha, Cambodia under Pol Pot, Vietnam under Ho Chi Minh... do I need to go on? What's the point of this childish exercise?
Russia does not want to militarily conqueror Europe. That is not in the realm of reality. They want influence, but not to take it over.Putin wants Europe still. All of it.
*yawn* I'm not at all surprised you would reply in this fashion - after all, you did post the following:None of those examples were communist. They were socialist dictatorships. You don't seem to know what a communist system is.

That so? Then what were those Soviet tank divisions doing in East Germany during the Cold War? What about all those maps on https://www.nato.int/cps/fr/natohq/declassified_138298.htm ? Or will you argue that, well, the Soviet Union may have wanted to militarily conquer Europe, but Russia is not at all like that, and has no such plans?Russia does not want to militarily conqueror Europe. That is not in the realm of reality. They want influence, but not to take it over.
By the way, this reads exactly like what many uninformed know-it-alls (not you, of course) said about Ukraine just prior to the 2022 invasion.Russia does not want to militarily conqueror Europe. That is not in the realm of reality. They want influence, but not to take it over.
