My bet is the order was given and either declined (kinda a western thing though) or no one answered the red phone.Surprised chemical weapons have not been used by Putin or Assad yet.
My bet is the order was given and either declined (kinda a western thing though) or no one answered the red phone.Surprised chemical weapons have not been used by Putin or Assad yet.
Unless it succeeds then it’s a Revolution.I have reasonable suspension that a Kudyata is underway in Damascus. @DEFCON Warning System @RiffRaff @Torch @Irag8er
As long as Russia loses idc what happens. Looks like exactly that is happening so I'm happy. Russia losing a footing in middle east is big deal. Big win. Imo.
Remember, HTS declared terrorist org. Bu the United States.
But what might Russia do to bring this to halt and prevent this?As long as Russia loses idc what happens. Looks like exactly that is happening so I'm happy. Russia losing a footing in middle east is big deal. Big win. Imo.
Nothing they left themselves open because of Ukraine. Putin the master strategist.But what might Russia do to bring this to halt and prevent this?
But what might Russia do to bring this to halt and prevent this?
They could use chemical weapons but at this rate won't change much. Even more so with a Kudyata underway in Damascus. Not only is Russia tapped in the region but can't do ANYTHING in time how fast Assad is collapsing.Nothing they left themselves open because of Ukraine. Putin the master strategist.![]()
What do you think? Is Syria worth more than Ukraine to Russia? I think the only reasonable thing would be to retreat to Assad-loyal bases in order to wait out the collapse of the general government and see where to go from there.But what might Russia do to bring this to halt and prevent this?
Also, like what one of Trump's previous security advisors Xed, perhaps Russia are in a sense allowing rebels to overthrow him. There might be more for Russia to gain in a situation where the rebel groups turn on each other instead of Assad.But what might Russia do to bring this to halt and prevent this?
Depends, is Russia content to do as you suggest and see where the chips finally lie?What do you think? Is Syria worth more than Ukraine to Russia? I think the only reasonable thing would be to retreat to Assad-loyal bases in order to wait out the collapse of the general government and see where to go from there.
I think between prioritizing this and Ukraine they choose Ukraine every time over this when it comes to spending military resources, we've seen some clear diplomatic moves between Turkey, Russia and Iran that seem (at least to me) indicate that neither of the greater powers involved here want the situation to deteriorate to complete anarchy, and are willing to work together in spite of supporting opposing sides in this conflict to prevent that. If any side is going to try to help out Assad more militarily, that's likely Iran. And if the rebels were Shia that'd be a golden opportunity for them to gain a new militia to hurt Israel with, buut since the HTS are Sunni they might not be too keen on it. I do think the rebels could potentially become an asset of Iran if they play their cards right. And last part of pure speculation, conflict in Syria could be an opportunity for Russia to attempt to create some kind of European refugee crisis 2015 2.0 that could generate an increased pro-putin wave in Europe if it happens. TLDR: While the greater powers here (especially Russia and Iran) would prefer a status quo and a stable Syria, a completely broken situation with winning opposition starting to turn on each other might be a situation that could lead to a better outcome in the long run if they're willing to take that gamble. Except a resurgence of ISIL, though. I think Turkey, Iran, and Russia are willing to work together to prevent that.Depends, is Russia content to do as you suggest and see where the chips finally lie?
Or are they going to initiate some tough offensive moves to calm the situation?
Interesting situation they find themselves in.
Kudeta or Kudayta are both proper ways to spell or use it. It's a French derivative more suited for what's occurring imo:Just a quick note: the correct spelling is coup d'etat. This is French for "strike (or blow) against the state". It took me a minute to figure out what the report thread title meant.
Edit: I hit post without finishing my thoughts. I think it's a bit concerning that western media is downplaying the significance of what's happening. This could certainly cause Russia to up the ante against the west. They have invested so much in keeping the Assad regime in power that the surely won't let this go unanswered.

Interesting! I've never seen that before, but I suppose it makes sense. Thank you for keeping an eye on this. This goes to show how quickly a "dormant" conflict can quickly wake up.Kudeta or Kudayta are both proper ways to spell or use it. It's a French derivative:
View attachment 6584
But I changed it in tittle to Kudeta or more familiar writing. Instead of Kudayta.
Hey just wanted to mention that I use google search for my technical research and I have never seen that Google AI bit give any answer that was correct, something was always wrong in it.Kudeta or Kudayta are both proper ways to spell or use it. It's a French derivative more suited for what's occurring imo:
View attachment 6584
But I changed it in tittle to Kudeta or more familiar writing. Instead of Kudayta.
Me too. But as I stated previously if Russia loses a major grip on the middle east that is a big win imo if they lose Syria entirely.Not so much worried about bigger powers getting involved since they have their hands full and are willing to talk. I am, however worried about the resurgence of ISIS in the governmental vacuum and major movements of displaced people that could be distabilizing for the west.
