Trump says U.S. forces will begin special operations & land strikes on Mexican soil.
-
Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.
Special Operations and Land Strikes Are Going to Begin Soon Against the Cartels in Mexico
- Thread starter NuclearID
- Start date
I doubt it. But thought I should post it just in case it does turn into something...
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2022
- Location
- PNW, United States
This your source?
I am not trying to start a debate about that image again. But it’s a poly market affiliate, and I would consider the source a junk source. Have any better ones?
I am not trying to start a debate about that image again. But it’s a poly market affiliate, and I would consider the source a junk source. Have any better ones?
That is why I literally said doubt it. Did you bother to read what I said? But wanted to post it in case it did turn out to be something. I didn't bother or care enough to dig further. Much bigger things going on than whatever the hell Trump is saying/tweeting at 9pm at night & weather he meant it or was taken out of context.
Don't like it? Then why don't you find out where this is coming from and post yourself.
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2018
Arabic numerals (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9) are the universally used, base-10 digits developed in ancient India, refined by Arab mathematicians who introduced them to Europe, making complex calculations easier than with Roman numerals.
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2022
- Location
- PNW, United States
My point was it’s a bad source and figured it’s good to point that out, instead of leaving a bad source unchallenged.
Why I posted it here, and again said "doubt it". I already openly challenged it. If you really want to help then find out yourself and post it. Instead of barking. I've already said I don't care enough too.
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2022
- Location
- PNW, United States
I was calling out the source. That’s ofc relevant to geopolitical analysis.
I think it does help to call out a bad source and if you don’t like that DONT POST BAD SOURCES. The source is a PRIMARY thing to interrogate when it comes to geopolitical news.
This topic has been exhausted and derailed. Thread is closed . Move on.
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2021
From the horse's mouth.
- Joined
- May 15, 2022
I have been asked in priv to comment on this, so here's my personal opinion:
- When posting any piece of news, you should cite the source.
- You would do well to cite primary sources (look it up), not retweets of retweets.
- Ultimately, your reputation as a news aggregator rests upon the reliability of your sources. Reputation takes a long time to build, and is easily destroyed.
- If you have a habit of relying on bad sources then people are perfectly fine - and in fact, advised to - automatically distrust anything you post. This applies even when your posts are sometimes consistent with the truth. That's entirely on you.
- Pointing out bad sources is very useful, although if you do it in a sarcastic manner (which is sometimes warranted) then be prepared for the fallout.
- The only DWS regulars whom I implicitly trust (i.e. believe what they say without checking it myself) are @DarkNoon and @Sentry .
Thanks but that's only when I tweet. Any post not a tweet such as this is not verified. Just me dumping data unchecked. I've said this before. But wanted to stress this.
Nuclear-ID Tweets yes, 100% fact checked beyond any doubt. Forums posts quoting some randos tweet (not me) is naturally not verified.
- Joined
- May 15, 2022
Yes, you have a consistent formatting style for your newsfeed, and that is what I was referring to.