• Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.

Trump's Tariff's - Updates

DEFCON Warning System said:
Can you give me the tl;dr? I don't want to watch a 23 minute video.
Click to expand...
The point of the video things changed with corporations taking over. in the beginning of America ya it was a near white country. as time progressed black, Mexican, Asian and other races started to grow/immerge as the economy turned in different directions. you will find original talks in older white people cause that's what they know, what the newer generations its about others now.

when you have time part take in the video i like ramzpaul he has a lot of great points.
 
Gargolu said:
The point of the video things changed with corporations taking over. in the beginning of America ya it was a near white country. as time progressed black, Mexican, Asian and other races started to grow/immerge as the economy turned in different directions. you will find original talks in older white people cause that's what they know, what the newer generations its about others now.

when you have time part take in the video i like ramzpaul he has a lot of great points.
Click to expand...
So how does any of that relate to the government being "paranoid" for implementing the policies they are?
 
DEFCON Warning System said:
I think your post demonstrates your own racism.
Click to expand...
Touched a nerve? 😁 I don't see you coming out, guns blazing, when a right-winger posts something controversial. Still - of course - you have the right to your opinions. As for myself - my opinion is that your reply demonstrates your right-wing bias (though I will admit that it's not as extreme as in the case of some other regular posters).

I will not get into a discussion on whether or not I am a racist - I don't identify as one, but that, of course, is always in the eye of the beholder.
DEFCON Warning System said:
Also those who have shown themselves as being allied with US enemies. Don't know why you'd want to keep those in the country.
Click to expand...
By that logic you should deport Donald Trump, since he's clearly aligned with US enemies (Russia, in this case).

On a more serious note: doing what you propose without a proper process for defining who is and who isn't a "US enemy" at any given point in time is a recipe for tyranny. (Remember Orwell: "We have always been at war with Eastasia!")
DEFCON Warning System said:
Also talked about annexing Greenland but not Iceland. Strange.
Click to expand...
That's called "whataboutism" - a deflection technique that's as widespread as it is dishonest.
DEFCON Warning System said:
DEI is itself based in racism, so being in support of DEI hiring practices is itself racist.
Click to expand...
I disagree, but - again - this is your opinion which you have the right to hold.
DEFCON Warning System said:
Cite source. I haven't heard anything about that.
Click to expand...
www.nbcnews.com

Federal workers fired in anti-DEI purge say it was because they're not white men

In a class action complaint, the former employees also said that the mass firings violated their First Amendment rights for perceived political stances.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com
Also, Trump's cabinet is 81% white, while the US itself is less than 60% white.
 
Socom7 said:
Touched a nerve? 😁 I don't see you coming out, guns blazing, when a right-winger posts something controversial. Still - of course - you have the right to your opinions. As for myself - my opinion is that your reply demonstrates your right-wing bias (though I will admit that it's not as extreme as in the case of some other regular posters).

I will not get into a discussion on whether or not I am a racist - I don't identify as one, but that, of course, is always in the eye of the beholder.

By that logic you should deport Donald Trump, since he's clearly aligned with US enemies (Russia, in this case).

On a more serious note: doing what you propose without a proper process for defining who is and who isn't a "US enemy" at any given point in time is a recipe for tyranny. (Remember Orwell: "We have always been at war with Eastasia!")

That's called "whataboutism" - a deflection technique that's as widespread as it is dishonest.

I disagree, but - again - this is your opinion which you have the right to hold.

www.nbcnews.com

Federal workers fired in anti-DEI purge say it was because they're not white men

In a class action complaint, the former employees also said that the mass firings violated their First Amendment rights for perceived political stances.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com
Also, Trump's cabinet is 81% white, while the US itself is less than 60% white.
Click to expand...
Allegedly when blacks or any minority grouping is less that 10%% of an industry it's their fault. Once minority groupings reach anything close to 40% it's racist dei.

Check the historical context on why there are so little groups of blacks, Hispanics, and non-whites (even Irish and Slavic/nordics) in institutional power in America.

1. The institutions hated imma grants in the past and wanted them to have no power and they were stigmatized. Leading to less opportunity and less education generation to generation.

This creating a gap between the groups, and it only makes the accessibility gap worse.

A lot of people have oversight on that, and you can even see some groups of whites hating their own kind aka middle-class whites will hate poor whites who live in trailers, and whites would even bar "race traitors" from institutional power in the past.

Let's not talk about how supporting something black or immigrant back in the day would get you a political hit piece and kill your career.

People don't understand how stuff stacks up over time and creates a gap. Perfect point: check black and Latino statistics in educated industries and combine them and most of the time not even 3:10 (30%) full up the industry...even better add up all Latino+black and it's about.... 113.5/212=53%

53% of the population is black or Latino, vs white... Yet those groups hold typically less than 30% of educated work... I wonder why, even in desegregated America.

Those groups also hold less in investments, they are typically stuck in lower quality of life areas with low economic opportunity and bad school districts... But I wonder why... Oh it's because they dont make enough and their parents lacked a foundational education due to a little something that happened less than 140.


Yet let's also look at the prison rates on black and Latino vs whites at a odds level...oh wait, that one is because they are all criminals...

Why do we see most whites in prison coming from the same communities as blacks or Latino in prisons... Oh wait lack of economic mobility and opportunity... Check the prison demographics on the whites who end up there. They came from the same position as many of the blacks and Latinos... But we can talk about that.

Why do Latinos and blacks that have the opportunity to live like high middle or high class with the same educational opportunities perform well? Oh wait....

Why do whites with bad educational prospects get trapped in the bad economic state, projects, trailer homes... And it compounds... And then the family becomes embedded in crime or low end labor... Hmm... Kind of makes me wonder.

If any person white or not lives with bad water supply they will get sick, if anyone lives near uranium deposits they will get fucked up if not properly handled. If someone lives in a economy resolving around crime....what's going to happen? If someone lives in a community that doesn't value education and values doing drugs what happens?

So many whites today that were thrown away by their own race are now accepting ideals from communities also thrown away by middle class whites so they can survive. Aka crime, shady stuff, and low economic opportunity work.

So it's not minorites but minorites+low economic whites .

When people say whites they aren't referring to all whites, they are referring to white that are instructionally powerful and have their life set for them due to no bad factors such as education/environment because they were afforded that position based on something they didn't do... Aka their family compounded money during slavery + segregation and got roles and stacked it bringing more family into it.


Same happens for leadership in a lot of countries, they come from the higher ends of society because they have family who cultivated it and passed it down.

Same what happened to factory workers in shitty conditions, same happens in tech workers today, most of your medical workers...yeah their family was medical.

Compounders happen generation to generation and due to seg/slavery that compounded against minority groups hard to set most whites ahead, not all whites.

Whites who go to Harvard, mit, Stanford, Princeton... They are the whites we are talking about. We aren't talking about your white that went to community college and worked food. We are talking about the white that got into Harvard because Daddy knows dean Daddy knows blank or daddy had blank on a string due to working at f500, because their parents got there parents got them in there because their parents worked there as entry level during segregation so the nepotism stacks.

Yet poor janitor Daniel/Chris can't get shit because his family didn't have economic mobility during slavery/seg/ or any event that empowered a goruping. So yeah look at the percentages, the government was trying to enforce a better opportunity for more minorities so they could offset this moat institutional whites have created.
 
Socom7 said:
By that logic you should deport Donald Trump, since he's clearly aligned with US enemies (Russia, in this case).
Click to expand...
Your logic is flawed. Trump is a US citizen. Those being deported are not.

Socom7 said:
On a more serious note: doing what you propose without a proper process for defining who is and who isn't a "US enemy" at any given point in time is a recipe for tyranny. (Remember Orwell: "We have always been at war with Eastasia!")
Click to expand...
It seems to be different considering the the people in question are not citizens and can have their privilege to be in the country revoked.

Socom7 said:
That's called "whataboutism" - a deflection technique that's as widespread as it is dishonest.
Click to expand...
No, it's called a comparison. You made a statement that implied the US wanted to annex Canada because it was white but didn't want to annex Mexico because it wasn't white. I provided a comparison where the US rejected annexing a white country.

Federal workers fired in anti-DEI purge say it was because they're not white men​

Click to expand...
That's not evidence. That's just someone expressing an opinion. Cite statistics. Facts.

Socom7 said:
Also, Trump's cabinet is 81% white, while the US itself is less than 60% white.
Click to expand...
What criteria was used to hire those people? Was it because they were the best of the known candidates, or were they hired because they were white? Until you know, you can't legitimately comment.
 
NCDinosFan said:
Allegedly when blacks or any minority grouping is less that 10%% of an industry it's their fault. Once minority groupings reach anything close to 40% it's racist dei.

Check the historical context on why there are so little groups of blacks, Hispanics, and non-whites (even Irish and Slavic/nordics) in institutional power in America.

1. The institutions hated imma grants in the past and wanted them to have no power and they were stigmatized. Leading to less opportunity and less education generation to generation.

This creating a gap between the groups, and it only makes the accessibility gap worse.

A lot of people have oversight on that, and you can even see some groups of whites hating their own kind aka middle-class whites will hate poor whites who live in trailers, and whites would even bar "race traitors" from institutional power in the past.

Let's not talk about how supporting something black or immigrant back in the day would get you a political hit piece and kill your career.

People don't understand how stuff stacks up over time and creates a gap. Perfect point: check black and Latino statistics in educated industries and combine them and most of the time not even 3:10 (30%) full up the industry...even better add up all Latino+black and it's about.... 113.5/212=53%

53% of the population is black or Latino, vs white... Yet those groups hold typically less than 30% of educated work... I wonder why, even in desegregated America.

Those groups also hold less in investments, they are typically stuck in lower quality of life areas with low economic opportunity and bad school districts... But I wonder why... Oh it's because they dont make enough and their parents lacked a foundational education due to a little something that happened less than 140.


Yet let's also look at the prison rates on black and Latino vs whites at a odds level...oh wait, that one is because they are all criminals...

Why do we see most whites in prison coming from the same communities as blacks or Latino in prisons... Oh wait lack of economic mobility and opportunity... Check the prison demographics on the whites who end up there. They came from the same position as many of the blacks and Latinos... But we can talk about that.

Why do Latinos and blacks that have the opportunity to live like high middle or high class with the same educational opportunities perform well? Oh wait....

Why do whites with bad educational prospects get trapped in the bad economic state, projects, trailer homes... And it compounds... And then the family becomes embedded in crime or low end labor... Hmm... Kind of makes me wonder.

If any person white or not lives with bad water supply they will get sick, if anyone lives near uranium deposits they will get fucked up if not properly handled. If someone lives in a economy resolving around crime....what's going to happen? If someone lives in a community that doesn't value education and values doing drugs what happens?

So many whites today that were thrown away by their own race are now accepting ideals from communities also thrown away by middle class whites so they can survive. Aka crime, shady stuff, and low economic opportunity work.

So it's not minorites but minorites+low economic whites .

When people say whites they aren't referring to all whites, they are referring to white that are instructionally powerful and have their life set for them due to no bad factors such as education/environment because they were afforded that position based on something they didn't do... Aka their family compounded money during slavery + segregation and got roles and stacked it bringing more family into it.


Same happens for leadership in a lot of countries, they come from the higher ends of society because they have family who cultivated it and passed it down.

Same what happened to factory workers in shitty conditions, same happens in tech workers today, most of your medical workers...yeah their family was medical.

Compounders happen generation to generation and due to seg/slavery that compounded against minority groups hard to set most whites ahead, not all whites.

Whites who go to Harvard, mit, Stanford, Princeton... They are the whites we are talking about. We aren't talking about your white that went to community college and worked food. We are talking about the white that got into Harvard because Daddy knows dean Daddy knows blank or daddy had blank on a string due to working at f500, because their parents got there parents got them in there because their parents worked there as entry level during segregation so the nepotism stacks.

Yet poor janitor Daniel/Chris can't get shit because his family didn't have economic mobility during slavery/seg/ or any event that empowered a goruping. So yeah look at the percentages, the government was trying to enforce a better opportunity for more minorities so they could offset this moat institutional whites have created.
Click to expand...
you know i didnt read all of what you wrote but i stopped at white people have no asperations well have you ever though that they just wanted to live they way they lived? cause i use to be white trash at some point and i loved it forget education i was on POF or OKCUPID and got laid many times but it was only at the point were i got tired of temp jobs laying off all the time and i moved states and really got lucky so it was kind of a trade off you know getting laid for 100k a year job.
 
Gargolu said:
what kind of tariff's?
Click to expand...
The kind that don't involve discussions on whether or not the white race is dying out or not. I mean come on guys this is being used for important reporting about an ongoing world event lets keep it focused.
 
Peter Griffin said:
How did they get the 25% fentanyl tariff equated I wonder. Honestly don't understand why Trump didn't just start with these tariffs on China and leave it at that, It would've gotten the message across the same without making our market so volatile.
Click to expand...
after bill signed the nafta act did you ever think it was going to happen to correct its self again and or how? cause pulling the economic woas from china is going to be very bad, we failed with russia cause they figured out how to make stuff inside the country as were the usa was acting like china to make a buck from anything and everybody but china is just nasty they wont play fair.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom