Yup. Which don't think would help Russia either to just throw more weight behind a already failing, catastrophic, and embarrassing front on Ukraine.
Well, they may consider it out of reach unless they put more resources into it. That, too, can be considered logical.
I am basing on it on the initial incursions and the following subsequent adjustments to the battle. They are obviously fully committed and they are not achieving their goals. It is not logical that they would utilize this overwhelming military and weapons to achieve the adjusted and limited aims they now have in Ukraine. They have already used these weapons fairly significantly. so it is not a matter of Russian legal constraint.<removed, getting personal> I'll give you 1 the first to start with. Find three different sources on Russian military forces. Study each one and pick the differences with information than come to your conclusions. Now do that with every other subject you challenge and don't know the answers.
www.independent.co.uk
www.pennlive.com
www.theguardian.com
Forget it. You have no idea. Carry on in your pursuit of whatever and best of luck.I am basing on it on the initial incursions and the following subsequent adjustments to the battle. They are obviously fully committed and they are not achieving their goals. It is not logical that they would utilize this overwhelming military and weapons to achieve the adjusted and limited aims they now have in Ukraine. They have already used these weapons fairly significantly. so it is not a matter of Russian legal constraint.
You are the one making the argument that they have this overwhelming military power. So conversely you can search and provide the sources that shows Russian has a military of achieving the results you propose.
What to be gained by declaring war
The consensus is the only tool declaring war would give Putin would be the draft. That and mobilizing the Russian population to support the war.
They have already changed some press laws criminalizing speaking out against the war. They are also now changing a law that allows older service members to reenlist.
Putin ‘to declare all-out war on Ukraine on Russian Victory Day’, officials fear
Russian leader could use Victory Day celebrations to stage ‘greater call to arms’Russia may declare war on Ukraine on May 9 – and use it as a reason to double down on attacks | Opinion
Russia’s actually declaring war would represent a major shift in how Russian President Vladimir Putin and his colleagues publicly address the conflict.
Russia passes law targeting free speech and pulls plug on Twitter and Facebook
The Russian government blocked access for its citizens to Facebook and Twitter on Friday as its invasion of Ukraine showed no signs of letting up.www.yahoo.com
Russia may scrap age limits for soldiers to bolster Ukraine invasion force
Legislation would allow recruitment of older professionals as military faces infantry shortage
what are the difference you keep saying that but you only allude, never say what the difference are.
I have stated several times for you to do homework before. Only then will you see the big picture. Direct questions to Director , as he has already replied to you. Obviously your not listening or understanding me, hence you should study your questions yourself. Totally agree to disagree . GOODLUCK.
Hunched over. Weird posture. Losing his train of thought. Looks to be in pain. And he's doing that thing with his leg again.
WMDs and all out cyber war on the West? That is not an option unless they want to skip right to WW3. That is the only option they haven’t resorted to yet likely due to ignored orders or Putin believing he is “winning”.
Even if Putin died, we still have a bunch of his enablers ready to take command. I wouldn’t be so quick to wish for his death. Could make things worse initially at least.
His death would at least serve one important purpose: it would give everyone else a convenient outlet for assigning blame. I came across an insightful comment recently: "In 10 years' time Russians will believe that Putin was a foreign agent sent by the insidious West to ruin Russia."
There is a segment in USA NatSec OSINT which believes that disease is something we can celebrate.
And this demonstrates the issue with USA IC and NatSec community.
Because after all, why would we worry about "nuclear Armageddon?"
And this will end war
what exactly are your specific suggestions to correct this besides renaming agencies.
Between 20-30% losses in Ukraine
www.nationalreview.com
www.thenationalnews.com
What exactly can they do different besides conscription. They have already passed specific laws to limit press reporting and speaking out against the war.
The exact details I don't know off hand, but you are right that conscription would be one of them.
