- Joined
- Oct 18, 2017
"Collapsing."
Why? Did all of the Twitter servers shut down? Apparently not.
This is the problem with the narrative-centric approach, rather than the fact-centric approach, to "news" and "world events."
Clearly without an IT workforce background.
Trust me, Twitter and Elon Musk can get server operations personnel to support Twitter servers from anywhere in USA/world.
(And of course MOVE the Twitter servers and Twitter HQ, etc. - and beyond the USA borders - as companies do every DAY.)
When it comes to personnel for new code, really comes down to new features, which can roll out when they want/not at all.
When it comes to personnel for content censorship, that really is a non-issue in the USA, which is the largest market. Other markets can shut Twitter off if they want (and "fine"). OK, and so what? Will Musk care?
The censors want to believe their "policy" protection is so vital that computer information service cannot operate without them.
I have historical news for the censors. Such computer information services have and will exist without supplicating to their demands - before, during, and after Twitter.
What do the censors think we have been doing for the past 30 years since the World Wide Web widespread access?
Relying on their censorship and AI language to filter what the public can/cannot communicate?
WWW active over 10 years before Twitter was even introduced, let alone "popular." We existed just fine.
This is the problem with the narrative-centric approach, rather than the fact-centric approach, to "news" and "world events."
Clearly without an IT workforce background.
Trust me, Twitter and Elon Musk can get server operations personnel to support Twitter servers from anywhere in USA/world.
(And of course MOVE the Twitter servers and Twitter HQ, etc. - and beyond the USA borders - as companies do every DAY.)
When it comes to personnel for new code, really comes down to new features, which can roll out when they want/not at all.
When it comes to personnel for content censorship, that really is a non-issue in the USA, which is the largest market. Other markets can shut Twitter off if they want (and "fine"). OK, and so what? Will Musk care?
The censors want to believe their "policy" protection is so vital that computer information service cannot operate without them.
I have historical news for the censors. Such computer information services have and will exist without supplicating to their demands - before, during, and after Twitter.
What do the censors think we have been doing for the past 30 years since the World Wide Web widespread access?
Relying on their censorship and AI language to filter what the public can/cannot communicate?
WWW active over 10 years before Twitter was even introduced, let alone "popular." We existed just fine.


