-
Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.
UA-RU-NATO War | Discussions | Jun. 1st/Sep. 13th 2025
- Thread starter Irag8er
- Start date
- Status
We can call them that right now!
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2017
- Location
- Perth Western Australia
Surely Putin isn't setting foot on American soil ( Alaska) for a meeting with Trump?
I have no clue how they will spin not arresting him. Aside from the obvious suicidal act, how do you pressure other nations to then enforce warrants?
I guess they could, temporarily make it a extension of the Russian UN mission?
Everyone in the world is SUPPOSED to be free to come and go to the UN.
Hasn’t really been tested yet. I waiting to see if the Chinese get to stay in NY during our next dust up. (I vote yes)
The current Chinese Communist Dictator and his Regime were not recognized during the Korean War.
Do we kick Major Powers (read Nuclear) out of the USA during war? Anyone gots a legal degree (Jurors whatever) on the wall and can answer that?
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2017
- Location
- Perth Western Australia
Yes I honestly can't believe Putin himself would trust or risk it. Then again would America risk it? It looks like a bad situation either way. I am truly seriously shocked. Be funny as fuck if the door opens on Russian plane and instead of Putin Medvedev steps out
actually it would be funny as fuck if Putin does and after meeting goes back to Russia. all these poor Putin haters here , I can only imagine their pain and frustration 
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2021
Probably have so much security it will look like an invasionYes I honestly can't believe Putin himself would trust or risk it. Then again would America risk it? It looks like a bad situation either way. I am truly seriously shocked. Be funny as fuck if the door opens on Russian plane and instead of Putin Medvedev steps out
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2010
- defconwarningsystem
- DEFCONWSALERTS
- YOUTUBE
- DefconWarningSystem
The US is not part of the ICC
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2022
Pretty sad we allow this kind of rhetoric on USA social media sites. Call it censorship whatever you want, these Russians shouldn't be using our platforms to say horrid shit like this IMHO.
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2021
This statement is true. I was in the UK and France last year and the news on TV was defiantly far to the
. The liberal governments in Europe hate anything conservative. I don't think Trump cares about that in the lest. If he doesn't like the way things are going in the meeting he WILL walk away.
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2021
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2018
- Location
- Guayaquil - Ecuador
Bohdan Krotevych, former chief of staff of the Azov brigade and a National Guard lieutenant colonel: "Mr. President, I sincerely don’t know what exactly is being reported to you, but I’m informing you: on the Pokrovsk – Kostiantynivka line, without exaggeration, it’s complete chaos. And this chaos has been growing for a long time, worsening with each passing day... A stable line of combat contact, as such, effectively doesn’t exist."
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2024
What if Trump tries to sell Alaska to Putin? Anything is possible! !
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2024
If they do, it would be a Russian nuclear attack on the USA.
- Joined
- May 15, 2022
Well, yesterday he said in a presser that he was "going to Russia" to meet with Putin. And if you watch Russian propaganda outlets, you'll notice they continue to spin the story that the sale of Alaska to the US was illegitimate, and that it's actually occupied Russian land.What if Trump tries to sell Alaska to Putin? Anything is possible! !
Mentally they are both on the same page - Alaska isn't really regarded by either of them as part of the US.
My money is on Russia till ~2035.
China will have time to build back better after their Airforce is reduced to static displays following the “US war of imperialist aggression fighting over the peaceful seeking peoples on Formosa.”
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2021
I disagree, to much oil there.
The sale (IMHO) is 100% legitimate. The UN (such as it is) and the World Court has continuously stated about successor Government assuming and incurring the formers debts, treaty obligations & trade agreements.
Unless there was a special clause stating that 107 years after a communist revolution begins the purchase will revert. Obviously it didn’t. Of course Russia was desperate for cash and the USA was set to seize it ah la Russia and Ukraine (only we would win, so the same but different) so I’m going with duress. Who knows.
But oil and fiishing are a huge industry for this country. Food and hydrocarbons…not giving that up.
Unless there was a special clause stating that 107 years after a communist revolution begins the purchase will revert. Obviously it didn’t. Of course Russia was desperate for cash and the USA was set to seize it ah la Russia and Ukraine (only we would win, so the same but different) so I’m going with duress. Who knows.
But oil and fiishing are a huge industry for this country. Food and hydrocarbons…not giving that up.
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2022
- LOCATION
- Fly over country
And this is where the the old Scottish adage comes into play. Possession is 9/10ths of the law.
Rooted in the Roman principle of Uti possidetis, “as you now possess, it is yours.
Kind of like Crimea.
The insanity of the world today that we argue about historic rightful owners of territory defending those who were too weak or incapable of holding on to. Or worse yet no longer exist in contemporary form.
Russians arguing possession, AGAIN based on past Colonial expansion, yet being to weak in the past to hold on to.
Next China will be claiming the territories controlled by the Khan because of tangential asiatic historic ties to the Mongols. Oh wait they already did that with Tibet. Tibet after all is a colony of China today. Just as Taiwan is a colony of Chinas that communist China could not control and “Lost Possession” of.
I know I went far afield there but there’s a point in there about the absurdities of international legal arguments.
Like arresting a leader of a foreign nation you invited to your nation.
Legal statutes or principles between nations are a farce and mostly just tools or convenience or propaganda.
All laws are enforced by guns and bombs. Ultimately so is your speed limit or arming in tow away zones. You do what someone says or the force compliance. If you resist, well the Meter Maid doesn’t arrest people, the call for Armed Officers. (All of these in the USA). Resist the Officers and they call SWAT. Now it elevated to comply or die.
Countries are no different. They start with a string of (repugnant smarmy o2 thief’s) diplomats. Then when words fail militaries step in. They force compliance a the tip of a bayonet (really bad place to be).
In the end while we have a nice shiny veneer of tranquility with places such as the UN (a wretched hive of scum and villainy) and the ICJ in the end it’s a enforced through force or the threat of force. A good Example are Landmines, Cluster Bombs and White Phosphorus (my personal favorite) Most of the world has banned some or all they above.
The USA (Ultimate Super Power, probably able to take on the entire world (and lose but it would leave a mark) said “ umm No” and continues to make very good use off all of them.
China (Super Power, apprentice) excluding the USA, completely ready to crush everyone else except one;
Russia. AFAIK They didn’t even bother to replay to the bans.
Like a fallen angel or punch drunk fighter, they still think they are a super power, but alas they are not. Who know being a Communist dictatorship had a down side. Russia has really shown that she is a paper tiger atm. But still a very dangerous foe (Like a wounded arthritic Bear) the Russians are not on board the Great Liberal Democracy, feel good about warfare, hugging train.
Again by the force of arms they demur.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2023
- Location
- New Delhi, India
Guess who else is a communist dictatorship?
- Status