• Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.

Insider Trading —Iran War

Well the laws for insider trading are left pretty vague and hard to enforce. Unless there's a clear smoking gun, any circumstantial evidence is almost always tossed in court. So while it may be obvious insider trading is going on. Granted we don't know exactly by who. Without a smoking gun or witness, it will always go unpunished.

The government doesn't have the authority to truly clamp down or enforce insider trading laws. Only once in a blue moon do they get lucky and it's because the insider trader got sloppy.

👉ONLY way this changes is through reforms passed through Congress to give proper authorities the authority to track/compile cases, then arrest those suspected, then most importantly changing the laws around insider trading to be more easier to convict those guilty of it.

Short of that. This will always be a problem, a growing one too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Torch
👉ONLY way this changes is through reforms passed through Congress to give proper authorities the authority to track/compile cases, then arrest those suspected, then most importantly changing the laws around insider trading to be more easier to convict those guilty of it.
Short of that. This will always be a problem, a growing one too.
And since Congress is typically guilty of insider trading, it will never happen/change. Ever. To think otherwise is quite literally the definition of a fools dream.

Like asking wolfs to protect the sheep den. Duh.

Oh and Democrats in Congress are just as guilty of this as Republicans. So save the cheap party partisan bullshit please with me. I checked out of that brainwash rout years ago. BOTH parties are a cancer on America. It's just one is more honest about it, while the other charades itself as morally superior when it's just as fucking guilty. 🥱
 
BOTH parties are a cancer on America. It's just one is more honest about it, while the other charades itself as morally superior when it's just as fucking guilty. 🥱
Welllllll.... I could argue that Democrats pandering to minorities to get their votes and then completely ignoring them once elected could be classified as a charade of moral superiority. Campaign = "We're not racist like the other guy; vote for us!" Once elected = *crickets*

I don't make the distinction that you do anymore. One party is bone cancer; the other party is brain cancer. Both are equally lethal to the country and the citizens.
 
Welllllll.... I could argue that Democrats pandering to minorities to get their votes and then completely ignoring them once elected could be classified as a charade of moral superiority. Campaign = "We're not racist like the other guy; vote for us!" Once elected = *crickets*
Wellll... I was talking about a wide range of things. Such as election reform, lobbying, party donating, and yes your very good example too. And much more they also commit/guilty of while pretending their the answer to it.

They act as if they are above it, the solution, or accuse the other side of doing it (which the other side does do) but so do they, making it hypocritical. As I said. One is a little more honest about being a cancer while the other charades itself as the cure when it's just the same disease or slightly different disease.

Wake up America.
 
And since Congress is typically guilty of insider trading, it will never happen/change. Ever. To think otherwise is quite literally the definition of a fools dream.

Like asking wolfs to protect the sheep den. Duh.

Oh and Democrats in Congress are just as guilty of this as Republicans. So save the cheap party partisan bullshit please with me. I checked out of that brainwash rout years ago. BOTH parties are a cancer on America. It's just one is more honest about it, while the other charades itself as morally superior when it's just as fucking guilty. 🥱
I dont think anyone in the thread argued that Democrats AREN'T insider trading. The point here that was made that it is abundantly clear that the PRESIDENT is insider trading, and more than likely has been doing so since the beginning of his second term. Sure both sides do it. The difference is one is using the lives of American soldiers and civilians to do it.
 
Never happen.
Not when Public schools are soon to be a thing of the past, barely any young people will be independently thinking with the direction our focus on education has been going, but they will still be allowed to vote. It's almost like it's by design:unsure:
 
  • Like
Reactions: JPod
Oh good; falling back on the tired old "whatboutism" argument. You do care; just not when it's your guy with his hand in the cookie jar. I would be perfectly fine if every single politician who has violated the law while in office was hung in the public square. With apple pie and fireworks afterword. I am so fucking sick and tired of liberals making excuses for Democrats and conservatives making excuses for Republicans. The level of hypocrisy in this country - and on this board - is disgusting. I hope all of you get exactly what you want from your elected leaders. And after you get it, I hope I'm there to see the look on your face when you realize the scope of the con job they've been playing on you for decades.
I have been very clear from the start IF CRIMINAL acts are revealed implicating individuals in or close to the administration. That can reasonably deserve convictions. Then they need charged and prosecuted. As yet as far as I can tell nothing has been brought to light but 8 anonymous bit coin accounts.

But all this current angst about “Potential” repugnant behavior would be much more transparent and sincere from an ethical standpoint. If the same vocalizations had been heard during previous scandals or implied scandals of other presidents.
This anger for political corruption was mostly silent over parade of news reports about the Biden Family escapades. Or how so many politicians come away from political service multi-millionaires from both parties. Like Massie doubling his net worth between 2020 and 2025.
But hypocrisy in politics is always a two way street it seems.

As far as political con jobs. What exactly ever made you think politics is a clean and ethical process. It’s a process of attempting to bring the wishes and needs of 340 million people together for the best hoped for outcome. Through the efforts of seldom wholly altruistic individuals.

I’m sorry that is NEVER going to be pretty clean or ethical.
Doesn’t matter which the nation, people, race, or time in history.
To assume that somehow this should expected or possible should get in line for the Darwin awards. Or maybe it’s just self-righteousness.

The entirety of the Federalist Papers was about how to construct a constitution that would “contain” the willful and manipulative nature of humans government and self-enrichment. Not erase it.

So how to fix it?
Change the laws, you know like make insider trading on stocks or industries illegal for all politicians.
Make it illegal for any politician to knowingly receive funds from ANY foreign source, period full stop. Apply the titles of nobility clause to it and end it.
But you also would have to include things like charitable trust set up only to see them later flow some of those same funds into domestic political campaigns.

As far as what-aboutism, until the scales are willing and successfully applied to all parties and individuals what exactly do you expect in the contact sport or politics.
In that light charges of what-aboutism are nothing more than deflections.
 
I dont think anyone in the thread argued that Democrats AREN'T insider trading. The point here that was made that it is abundantly clear that the PRESIDENT is insider trading, and more than likely has been doing so since the beginning of his second term. Sure both sides do it. The difference is one is using the lives of American soldiers and civilians to do it.
It is? Seriously show facts not innuendo.
 
"Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely"
This AI just exposed the BIGGEST legal insider trading operation in America. A platform called GovGreed built a seven-layer machine learning system that cross-references every stock trade disclosed by every sitting politician against the bills their committees control, the campaign donations they receive, and the companies their votes directly impact.
It scored all 540 politicians currently in Congress. And the numbers are crazy: 56% of every stock purchase made by Congress in the last 16 months was on a stock directly affected by a bill the buyer later voted on. That is 6,170 out of 11,016 total purchases. More than HALF of all congressional stock buys are on companies whose fate that same politician is about to decide.343 of 540 Congress members actively trade stocks while holding access to nonpublic legislative information.
The AI identified 752 active "Triple Signals" in the current Congress. A Triple Signal fires when three conditions line up at once: The politician sits on the committee controlling a bill, they traded stock in a company affected by that bill, AND they received campaign contributions from that same industry.
The AI didn't discover anything Congress was hiding. It just organized what was already public into a pattern so obvious that nobody can pretend it isn't there anymore.
Anyone paying any attention to this at all knew this already. You don't become a multi-millionaire on a government salary. IMO
 
Hakeem Jefferies only pays $213 per YEAR in property taxes on his Brooklyn condo because when he became an Assemblyman he had a law changed that benefited him. Normally it would be taxed at $14,000 annually.
 
Back
Top Bottom