- Joined
- Jul 6, 2023
The train on the video (the attacked one) was not transporting European officials.
Unclear...What was the train Russia targeted carrying?
This is not the complete wording, and actually the Polish FM demonstrated that he doesn't know what he's talking about.Polish Foreign Minister Sikorski:"If Russia attacked Poland today and we took our gloves off we could defeat them pretty confidently we have overwhelmingly superior AirPower."
Well he does have US troops on the ground and might be thinking of the Polish AND US aircraft. Still I think it was nonsense aim at his electorate.This is not the complete wording, and actually the Polish FM demonstrated that he doesn't know what he's talking about.
Infact he was corrected by his general, who didn't seem really convinced about what was being said.
It has to be contextualized, Poland's FM is flexing the muscle to their own electoral base, elections are approaching (1 year).
I have a hard time believing Poland has air superiority over Russia unless he is counting NATO assets.This is not the complete wording, and actually the Polish FM demonstrated that he doesn't know what he's talking about.
Infact he was corrected by his general, who didn't seem really convinced about what was being said.
It has to be contextualized, Poland's FM is flexing the muscle to their own electoral base, elections are approaching (1 year).
IMO putin was sending a message. We see you and we can hit you if we want.What was the train Russia targeted carrying?
A drone has been shot down by NATO fighter jets over Lithuania, according to Lithuania's president.
Russia couldn't even establish air superiority over Ukraine. Either he's holding back his air force for some reason or their air combat capabilities have been seriously overestimated.I have a hard time believing Poland has air superiority over Russia unless he is counting NATO assets.
Absolute bold-faced lie. There isn't even any nuance to this blatantly false statement."The World’s Diesel price rise is mostly caused by the Russia/Ukraine War, not Iran,"
The problem for Russia lies in the rigidness of the greyzone and frontline in Ukraine. Ukrainian backlines are permeated by entrenched anti air batteries, and the frontlines have many teams dedicated to defending against air intrusions close to the frontline. That is why Russia has opted for using stand off munitions and largely abandoned the concept of air superiority when there is just no concept of mobile warfare in Ukraine that is needing to be supported to begin with. Why fly planes that aren't using adequate stealth technology at all in a heavily AD saturated AO when you can just fly a 4000 dollar drone packed full of explosive charges into the enemy concentrations?Russia couldn't even establish air superiority over Ukraine. Either he's holding back his air force for some reason or their air combat capabilities have been seriously overestimated.
I wonder if the US would actually do anything if Russia murdered someone on American soil.feel like this may be something else to watch, too:
I would be shocked if the Russia Ukraine war is done by 2030. Defense ministers need to push a tangible target so countries have a target to aim for revitalizing their militaries, hence why they say 2030. That’s why what they actually say is by 2030 they expect Russia will have rebuilt its military enough to be a threat to NATO, not that Russia is going to invade a NATO country in 2030.Off topic but not off topic: what’s everyone’s opinion on a NATO-Russia conflict by 2030 as defense ministries have been saying? Sooner? Later? (Move if not applicable to this thread)
