Trump himself does not want to participate in the deployment of Western troops in Ukraine, and this is a serious problem for Kiev and Europe, because Russia is against it. Moscow has said many times that any deployment of troops from NATO countries in Ukraine is unacceptable.
So what security guarantees can we talk about?
Russia is giving signals to the US that it can conclude huge energy and other agreements with it. But this may not happen without a ceasefire in Ukraine.
Kyiv, however, demands a "security guarantee".
more, the White House's willingness to conclude agreements with Moscow or Kiev is one thing and convincing American companies to invest in such an uncertain security environment is another thing.
I might add, theoretically guaranteed by weak Europeans...
Therefore, Russian expectations that the new partnership and new joint investment projects between the US and Russia will serve as the basis for a reset, which may be the basis for a "security guarantee", are also rather doubtful.
Rather, it is about redirecting Russian aggression in a different direction - China's. In my opinion, this may be the goal of the White House and a kind of "security guarantee
What the United States thinks about Russia-China relations was expressed quite honestly by Secretary of State Marco Rubio:
"[...] I don't know if we will ever be able to completely break Russia away from its relationship with China...
[...] If Russia becomes China's permanent junior partner in the long run, we will face a situation in which two nuclear powers unite against the United States.
And if this trend continues, even five or ten years from now, we could find ourselves in a situation where Russia, even if it wants to improve relations with the US, simply cannot do so because it has become completely dependent on China due to our cutting ties with them.