• Guests may view all public nodes. However, you must be registered to post.

Nato Members May Send Troops To Ukraine, Warns Former Alliance Chief

This according to Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico. I'd like to see a confirming source on that, given the gravity of such a development.
"I will limit myself to say that these theses (in preparation for the Paris meeting) imply a number of NATO and EU member states are considering that they will send their troops to Ukraine on a bilateral basis," Fico told a televised briefing following a meeting of Slovakia's security council.
"I cannot say for what purpose and what they should be doing there," he said, adding that Slovakia, a member of the EU and NATO, would not be sending soldiers to Ukraine.

For all we know those troops could be there for training purposes, or providing embassy security etc... It in no way implies frontline fighting.
 
It should be noted that the Slovak PM, Fico, isn't the most reliable of sources:
 
There will be no American soldiers in Ukraine until Russia kills American soldiers or a Russian attack on an American base (like Pearl Harbor). The USA has always worked this way.
 
@DEFCON Warning System sorry for making you move the discussion from REPORT thread to here... only to make a new thread about it... 👇

I thought it was just pure RUMINT at first but looks like it's not all hot air. So made new thread. @DEFCON Warning System @Friendly Engineer @Irag8er pls lock this thread so we may continue these new developments in the new thread. I am pretty shocked this story actually went "somewhere".
 
Last edited:
Is Kosovo in NATO?
It’s not a perfect comparison but an article 5 was not used for nato involvement there.
NATO nations can get involved, it’s all a matter of how involved that is.
And what the actual Russian reaction would be.
As well as the subsequent effects it will have on NATO stability.

We can speculate, but it’s above our pay grade.
I have an opinion but I don’t believe I have enough intel to make an informed decision.
Personally say up the stakes and keep pushing
 
Is Kosovo in NATO?
It’s not a perfect comparison but an article 5 was not used for nato involvement there.
NATO nations can get involved, it’s all a matter of how involved that is.
Article 5 is ambiguous and doesn't actually say anything about boots on the ground, but if Russia starts winning too hard then I expect the gloves to come off, at least as far as countries like UK and France are concerned. Even Scholz would probably have no choice, the coward that he is - Russia is, after all, as much of an existential threat to them as it is to Ukraine. Note that the USSR would very likely (and easily!) have conquered all of Europe if it hadn't run into stalwart opposition from the US. This is a point well remembered in European political circles (at least those that aren't in Putin's pocket).
Personally say up the stakes and keep pushing
Probably the only sane thing to do. Si vis pacem...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Torch
Is Kosovo in NATO?
It’s not a perfect comparison but an article 5 was not used for nato involvement there.
NATO nations can get involved, it’s all a matter of how involved that is.
And what the actual Russian reaction would be.
As well as the subsequent effects it will have on NATO stability.

We can speculate, but it’s above our pay grade.
I have an opinion but I don’t believe I have enough intel to make an informed decision.
Personally say up the stakes and keep pushing
NATO troops are deployed in Kosovo as part of KFOR.
 
If Zelinski had a brain he would allow elections as an easy way out of the shit he has got Ukraine in.
Last I checked, Russia was the one who invaded Ukraine, not the other way around.
 
Not the point really considering Russia gave opportunities for different outcome that was denied. Anyway I simply stating opportunity for Zelinski.
what opportunities? Oh yeah we’re just supposed to be magically aware of them.
 
Oh yeah that's right Boris never made it public. 🙄🤦‍♂️ my fault.
Sure he did never said he didn’t, and Russian was bombing Kiev everyday and unwilling to give on any substantial issue.
So we agree send in the troops and end the war.
 
Not the point really considering Russia gave opportunities for different outcome that was denied
Different outcomes? You mean, Russia gives a list of choices and if Ukraine doesn't agree, Russia gets a free pass to invade? Is that how it works?
 
Strange there were no requests from the West for Russia to open safe passage corridors from all the annexed regions of UKRAINE for those populations to leave safely back to safe Ukrainian territory. Nor reports of majority of those annexed populations screaming for help to remove Russian aggressors because the corridors requested were denied. We should just take Zelinski word on the situation without evidence. Sorry I don't recall media footage of said populations leaving in mass with suitcases and bags. We did see it happening from kyiv though. Interesting 😉🤔🧐🤦‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️ many of which don't want to return for several reasons I'm sure.😉😏🤷🏻‍♂️
 
What happened to Russia protecting Russians.
How much were Russians really under threat and how much was propaganda?

Remember, this was the same excuse Germany used.

And last I saw, Russia has a lot of land for those who think they are being persecuted.
 
Tell me something is Russian propaganda any better or worse than western propaganda?
Worse. At least in the West you have some independence. Independence in Russia leads to being falling out a window.

At least in the West, propaganda is self-imposed. In Russia, the government forces it on you.
 
Back
Top Bottom