- Joined
- Sep 6, 2022
- LOCATION
- Fly over country
As the sec Gen of nato which is a treatied org he would be in communication with the various member nations leadership.I never sent USA taxpayer dollars to Mr. Stoltenberg to talk about using nuclear bombs. Is NATO under nuclear attack? OK. So until then, a rational leader deflects the question.
They will have and do discuss public statement topics.
Part of the Historic and designed purposes of NATO IS that the US extends our nuclear umbrella over nato members if attacked.
It is part of his job to reflect the opinions and policies of member states wishes.
This is precedent and congressionally voted on legal treaty.
If Russia were to strike a nato member there would be NO vote regarding how we respond. The leaders of the nations would make that call as part of their duties.
If you want to see it changed then it must be changed by removing us from nato.
You might not agree or like it.
I suggests a separate topic on should the US remain in nato.
diplomats politicians and military leadership have spoken on this issue many many times. There is nothing unprecedented about it.
It is part of the diplomatic and military and political agreements amongst nato members.
So if you are opposed to that maybe a thread on should US remains in NATO.
Regarding how nato would respond if Ukraine was nuked it would have to be discussed. As I’ve said before I don’t believe a response would be necessary if Russia did act. Let Ukraine fight the war conventionally while haveing the votes in the various nato nations capitals for future response if it happens again.
