MTG alleges US is 'discussing using nuclear weapons on Iran' as tension flares up
The 52-year-old former Republican lawmaker, who left the party following a furious rivalry with
President Donald Trump, claimed that the possible use of nuclear weapons against Iran is being discussed in US strategy meetings.
Greene’s comments came as the Middle Eastern nation fired back at Trump's claim that he would soon declare the Strait of Hormuz part of US territory, saying the crucial energy waterway it has blockaded "will remain Iranian."
Standard practice.
Are All Options Discussed in Military Planning Including Nuclear?
Yes — U.S. military planning processes, including the Single Integrated Operational Plan (SIOP) and related nuclear employment policy, explicitly include nuclear options as part of the range of strategic choices considered.
How Nuclear Options Fit into Military Planning
U.S. military planning for potential conflict is not limited to conventional operations; it incorporates
nuclear employment policy and planning guidance as a formal component. This guidance comes from multiple levels — presidential directives, Department of Defense policy, and military-level instructions — and is integrated into the
Nuclear Weapons Employment Policy (NUWEP) and the
Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP) OUSD Acquisition & Sustainment+1.
The SIOP and Nuclear Options
The
Single Integrated Operational Plan (SIOP) was the U.S. general plan for nuclear war from 1961 to 2003, and it remains the basis for current nuclear war planning. The SIOP:
- Provides the President with a range of targeting options.
- Describes launch procedures and target sets for nuclear weapons.
- Integrates the nuclear triad — strategic bombers, land-based ICBMs, and sea-based SLBMs Wikipedia.
Planning Process
The process for developing nuclear options in military planning includes:
- Policy and guidance issuance from the President and Secretary of Defense.
- Target development and selection of adversary strategic facilities.
- Weaponeering and force planning.
- Force execution and battle damage assessment OUSD Acquisition & Sustainment.
These steps ensure that nuclear options are considered alongside conventional and other strategic options in the overall operational plan.
Extended Deterrence and Policy Context
U.S. nuclear policy also emphasizes
extended deterrence, meaning that nuclear options are part of commitments to allies, reinforcing the idea that nuclear considerations are embedded in broader military planning
Congress.gov.
In summary: U.S. military planning explicitly includes nuclear options, with the SIOP and related documents providing structured, classified plans for their use. These options are integrated into the overall strategic and operational planning process, ensuring that nuclear considerations are part of the decision-making framework.