Are we going to send manpower or provide total air cap for Ukraine? Likely not Biden WH wouldn’t do it, and European leaders don’t want that involvement, neither does Trump.
I hear Putin is going to “bend Trump over a whatever”. So again I ask what is the alternative to continuing what has become a stalemated war. Still waiting?
Should Russia have invaded Ukraine? No.
Could it have been won? Yes.
But we all know that wars are more than just technological and logistical endeavors. They are also about momentum, commitment and numbers.
NATO sending troops now is a 60/40 chance of changing the war. And a 95/5 % chance of it happening. So that’s a no.
Would more technology change the outcome, possibly but there are a lot of variables. Quantity, training and tactics.
And of course the other guy always gets a vote.
That is too many variables to depend on to blindly continue on the war.
So again if Ukraine comes away with some tangible security guarantees, what ever is required then it a win for Ukraine and a loss for Russia.
As far as Trump being Putin’s bitch, those who keep saying this thus far, what exactly do you propose?
Was what was being done working?
So is Trump doing the same thing going to work?
Was Biden NaTO leaders ever going to send troops? So why should we expect a change.
Trump failed because he failed to fix the mess that has been created? Really, is this going to be the claim?
What magic event over the horizon do you propose is going to occur to break this stalemate?
Do you want to escalate? Keep supplying a stalemated war for another three years in the hopium Putin will be ousted of the Russian federation will collapse. Keeping Putin militarily weak is one thing. Collapsing russia another multi generational period of wars and conflicts fought in the ass end of the world.