It was more than Zelinskyy "[refusing] to simply be a border state." Russia never believed the Orange revolution was legitimate, and never believed subsequent elections to be valid. This leads me to the following interesting question:
- If Russia never believed Zelinskyy to be legitimate, are any Russian offers of negotiation with Ukraine, either before the conflict or during the conflict, genuine offers of negotiation? After all, if you do not believe in an adversary's legitimacy to act on behalf of his or her state, do you really consider any agreement signed with the adversary to truly be binding?
Zelinskyy bending to the whim of his larger Russian neighbor would have been outright capitulation, and as I have explained before, would have been a violation of the Ukrainian presidential oath of office had Zelinskyy capitulated. And don't forget when Zelinskyy was offered evacuation by the west, he declined it by saying he did not need a ride, he needed arms. That suggests he has the courage of his convictions, a genuine desire to protect his country, and is not in it to merely put money in his pockets.
And lastly, we cannot ignore the fact that it is Russia invading Ukraine. Not the other way around. It is Russia that is killing Ukrainians. Not Zelinskyy. And if the Ukrainian people and military did not support their leader, I would think they be laying down arms and welcoming Russia in. But that is not what we are witnessing on the battlefield....
Russia can stop the fight at any time to save lives. If Russia is the nobler side in this conflict, why haven't they stopped fighting?